Digiday Research: US publishers hold mixed views on international expansion

European publishers

This research is based on unique data collected from our proprietary audience of publisher, agency, brand and tech insiders. It’s available to Digiday+ members. More from the series →

At the Digiday Publishing Summit in March in Vail, Colorado, we surveyed 49 publishing executives about their plans for international expansion.

U.S. publishers are less likely than their European counterparts to view international expansion as important. U.S. publishers in particular are split on the importance of international expansion, with 38 percent of U.S. publisher executives in Digiday’s March survey viewing it as important and 36 percent viewing it as unimportant. In contrast, nearly half of European publishers believe expanding internationally is important, according to Digiday’s earlier research.

U.S. publishers might value international expansion less due to their struggles in establishing themselves overseas in the past year. Mashable, after its sale to Ziff Davis, and HuffPost have scaled back their international ambitions. Similarly, Condé Nast struggled to build an audience for a U.K. version of Ars Technica and eventually shuttered it. As publishers pivot to reality, eliminating unnecessary or unprofitable markets and focusing on core domestic products, the importance of international expansion could diminish.

U.S. publishers that view international expansion as important have several motivating factors, one of which is growing existing audiences. Expanding international reach can help publishers appear more attractive to advertisers. Bustle opened a U.K. office earlier this year that was motivated in part by Bustle’s existing audience there, which was 3 million unique visitors in January, according to comScore. CNN-owned Great Big Story launched a Nordic version of its site after learning it had an audience of 3 million users from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden collectively.

U.S. publishers also see international expansion as an opportunity to develop alternative revenue streams. For example, Vox launched a food-focused site in the U.K. in an effort to draw lucrative branded content deals. For The Washington Post, ad revenue and subscriptions motivated international growth. Of course, growing subscriptions in international markets can be tricky for publishers due to issues like cultural differences, unfamiliar pricing models and limited brand awareness among users.

Check out our earlier research on publishers’ response to Google’s in-browser ad blocker here. Learn more about our upcoming events here.


More in Media

Publisher strategies: Condé Nast, Forbes, The Atlantic, The Guardian and The Independent on key revenue trends

Digiday recently spoke with executives at Condé Nast, Forbes, The Atlantic, The Guardian and The Independent about their current revenue strategies for our two-part series on how publishers are optimizing revenue streams. In this second installment, we highlight their thoughts on affiliate commerce, diversification of revenue streams and global business expansion.

How sending fewer emails and content previews improved The New Yorker’s newsletter engagement

The New Yorker is sending newsletters less frequently and giving paid subscribers early access to content in their inboxes in an effort to retain its cohort of 1.2 million paid subscribers and grow its audience beyond that.

The Rundown: How Amazon is wooing publishers to bolster its $50 billion ad business

Enhancements to Amazon Publisher Cloud and debut of Signal IQ represent the triopolist’s latest adland overture.