Join us Oct. 15-17 in Phoenix to connect with top media buyers
Digiday Research: US publishers hold mixed views on international expansion
This research is based on unique data collected from our proprietary audience of publisher, agency, brand and tech insiders. It’s available to Digiday+ members. More from the series →
At the Digiday Publishing Summit in March in Vail, Colorado, we surveyed 49 publishing executives about their plans for international expansion.
U.S. publishers are less likely than their European counterparts to view international expansion as important. U.S. publishers in particular are split on the importance of international expansion, with 38 percent of U.S. publisher executives in Digiday’s March survey viewing it as important and 36 percent viewing it as unimportant. In contrast, nearly half of European publishers believe expanding internationally is important, according to Digiday’s earlier research.
U.S. publishers might value international expansion less due to their struggles in establishing themselves overseas in the past year. Mashable, after its sale to Ziff Davis, and HuffPost have scaled back their international ambitions. Similarly, Condé Nast struggled to build an audience for a U.K. version of Ars Technica and eventually shuttered it. As publishers pivot to reality, eliminating unnecessary or unprofitable markets and focusing on core domestic products, the importance of international expansion could diminish.
U.S. publishers that view international expansion as important have several motivating factors, one of which is growing existing audiences. Expanding international reach can help publishers appear more attractive to advertisers. Bustle opened a U.K. office earlier this year that was motivated in part by Bustle’s existing audience there, which was 3 million unique visitors in January, according to comScore. CNN-owned Great Big Story launched a Nordic version of its site after learning it had an audience of 3 million users from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden collectively.
U.S. publishers also see international expansion as an opportunity to develop alternative revenue streams. For example, Vox launched a food-focused site in the U.K. in an effort to draw lucrative branded content deals. For The Washington Post, ad revenue and subscriptions motivated international growth. Of course, growing subscriptions in international markets can be tricky for publishers due to issues like cultural differences, unfamiliar pricing models and limited brand awareness among users.
Check out our earlier research on publishers’ response to Google’s in-browser ad blocker here. Learn more about our upcoming events here.
More in Media
Publisher alliance Ozone makes a larger play for U.S. advertisers
Publisher alliance Ozone is on a growth tear in the US and plans to expand its local headcount to 50 people next year.
Media Briefing: From blocking to licensing, publishers inch toward leverage with AI
There are new levers for publishers to test in the AI era. While they’re still far from holding the upper hand, compared to a year ago, the outlook no longer looks quite so bleak.
Mitigating ‘Google risk’: The Independent maps four-pillar growth plan for the AI era
The Independent has built its growth strategy around the “blue links risk” and has stopped measuring its success by audience reach.