Three seats left to attend the Digiday Media Buying Summit:

Join us Oct. 15-17 in Phoenix to connect with top media buyers

SECURE YOUR SEAT

Ad Tech Briefing: The futility of a Google breakup?

This Ad Tech Briefing covers the latest in ad tech and platforms for Digiday+ members and is distributed over email every Tuesday at 10 a.m. ET. More from the series →

Ad tech’s recurring question in 2025 so far has been, “What’s delaying the Google verdict?”

The honest answer? Well, nobody really knows… resulting in speculation, deferred decision-making, and overall prolonged anguish.

To clarify, this discussion is separate from the search case, which Google lost (and plans to appeal). Albeit, the prospect of a forced sale of Chrome, the Justice Department’s preferred remedy here, has to be considered. Especially in a world where Google’s Privacy Sandbox sways like the Sword of Damocles over the display advertising industry.  

Backroom dealings?

However, as presiding Judge Leonie M. Brinkema ponders in her chambers—closing arguments were heard in November—tectonic plates are shifting. And that’s not just in ad tech…

The “rocket docket” nature of early courtroom proceedings led many to anticipate Judge Brinkema’s ruling in December. However, the presence of Google chief Sundar Pichai at President Donald Trump’s inauguration has fueled speculation of backroom dealings. Given the current climate and actors involved, it’d be naive to think some form of settlement talks are not happening.

Should Google be subjected to a second consecutive antitrust ruling in a U.S. courtroom, the likelihood of a prolonged appeals process is near inevitable. As many in ad tech have observed, pulling apart the sinews of Google would not be an easy feat.

Hence, it’s not an incredibly Bold Call to say few advertisers contemplated a decapitated Google in their 2025 media planning. On this point, hat-tip to long-time Digiday sources Ciarán O’Kane and Robert Webster.  

The intricacies of Google’s ad stack emerged at trial, and the impact of divesting its sell-side would be widely felt. See Digiday’s explainer series below for more detail.

What’s the point?

The DOJ wants Google to divest its sell-side tools, but more than half of Digiday readers feel this is inadequate. If any impact is to be realized, Digiday readers claimed further behavioral remedies, such as making Google back header bidding. “They claim they are, but that’s not the reality… they could create their own Prebid adapter for header bidding,” said one survey respondent.

Meanwhile, others questioned whether the DOJ’s efforts were fit for the contemporary landscape. “With all of the new AI products/tools coming, I think the anti-trust trial is misguided,” said one anonymous survey participant. “There’s a lot of competition and change coming in both search and ad tech.”

Some theorized that Google’s launch of sell-side ad curation could represent efforts to offset the impact of a DOJ-forced divestiture. Advocates of such a theory could point to Google’s participation in the recent launch event of Scope3’s “agentic platform.”

Here, Google Ad Manager’s Darline Jeans spoke with Scope3 CEO Brian O’Kelley – who was a DOJ trial-witness in September – to discuss such efforts. Historians of the sector will note just how strange a sight that, i.e. “BOK” on stage with Google, would have posed just a few years ago…

Related Insights

However, that’s not to say that it’s a case of, ‘If you can’t beat ’em, join’ em… ‘ nor is that Digiday’s assessment of Scope3’s recent launch.

What it is a testament to is the current rate of change in ad tech midwifed by AI. As a result, business models and alliances need to radically change, a school of thought Google is clearly acting on. Simply forcing a sale of one Google unit will have minimal impact, with Arete Research’s B-Corp solution a widely-fancied remedy.

Amid all the uncertainty, one thing is clear: as the rocket docket stalls, tech has not. Regardless of the outcome, Judge Brinkema’s ruling will be applied to a very different media landscape to the contemporary picture.

If you feel strongly on any of the issues discussed above, then feel free to get in touch – no PR pitches please.

More in Media

Media Briefing: From blocking to licensing, publishers inch toward leverage with AI

There are new levers for publishers to test in the AI era. While they’re still far from holding the upper hand, compared to a year ago, the outlook no longer looks quite so bleak.

Mitigating ‘Google risk’: The Independent maps four-pillar growth plan for the AI era

The Independent has built its growth strategy around the “blue links risk” and has stopped measuring its success by audience reach.

Advertising Week Briefing: Creators emerge as the industry’s new power brokers

Advertising Week has had creator-focused content tracks in past years, but the rising presence of content creators at this year’s event represents an evolution in how creators are engaging with advertisers, both at industry conferences like Advertising Week and in general.