‘A glimpse of the internet of the future’: For a fee, Spiegel offers anti-tracking browsing
As privacy regulations and internet browsers tighten up, anti-tracking options emerge from publishers.
This month, German publisher Spiegel, which publishes weekly news magazine Der Spiegel, introduced a paid, ad-free subscription offer where users have the option of not being tracked by third-parties. Spiegel Pur is a response to a number of developing trends: Tightening privacy regulations, mounting user concerns with being tracked and more internet browsers restricting cross-site tracking.
Since Feb. 10, readers visiting Spiegel have had the option to browse non-subscriber content for free with ads and ad tracking still functioning. Or, they can buy a Pur subscription without ads and ad tracking for €4.99 ($5.38) a month for non-Spiegel+ subscribers. Spiegel+ subscribers can pay an additional €1.99 ($2.15) a month for no ads and no ad trackers.
In the announcement, the publisher said that with the Pur subscription some ads, like podcast ads, will remain because of the technical work to remove them. There will also be some tracking for internal analytics. The publisher did not respond to comment by press time.
While the additional revenue doesn’t go unwanted, Pur is about preserving existing programmatic advertising revenues, according to the publisher’s Medium announcement. In the coming months the Planet49 regulation, which states no cookies without consent, is expected to be drafted into German law. Advertisers and agencies requesting to target audiences who have explicitly given their consent will benefit Spiegel, who will still be able to charge premium prices for its ad slots. Without consent, the value of inventory drops.
Spiegel said Pur is a response to ad block-curious readers saying they would pay to turn off ads so they are no longer tracked. Germany experiences some of the highest cases of ad block users in Europe although the trend is stabilizing as the ad experience has improved and publishers have been more transparent and communicative about how their content is funded.
“With Spiegel Pur, this is a tiny glimpse of how the internet of the future will look,” said digital strategy consultant Oliver von Wersch. “Spiegel has become the first-mover in this instance. It has always had the willingness to be first, and now it is.”
Spiegel Pur is modeled on the Austrian publisher Standard’s consent framework. According to von Wersch, German data protection authorities suggest Standard’s consent framework meets certain regulations during ongoing discussions with German publishers about the finer points and interpretations of the law. However, the exact notion of what is compliant isn’t yet clear. Spiegel plans to iterate Pur.
Other publishers offer anti-tracking versions of browsing, but few so explicitly as Spiegel. For European audiences, The Washington Post offers and paid ad-free and anti-tracking experience.
Media analyst Thomas Baekdel questioned the legal basis for this option.
“If they are discussing ‘pay to not be tracked’, I don’t see how that would be accepted by the European Union,” he said. “It would dramatically undermine what the General Data Protection Regulation was designed to do. Publishers can offer an ad-free version for a price, but the tracking part is not legal to require payment to avoid.” Ultimately, publishers and the rest of the ecosystem are looking for more clear guidelines from data authorities about what is compliant.
Spiegel has subscriptions and ad revenue streams but ads are still the majority: In July 2018, 99% of Spiegel’s revenue came from online ads. In December it had 9.2 million monthly unique users in Germany according to Comscore stats, out of 61 million internet users in Germany.
In Germany, publishers have felt more keenly the impacts of audiences decreasing in value as browsers tighten tracking loopholes. Partly because Mozilla Firefox has a higher-than-usual market share of 14.24% according to Stats Counter Global Stats, third behind Google Chrome and Apple Safari. This makes finding new ways to monetize programmatic audiences without third-party tracking cookies especially critical. Equally, more publishers like Spiegel are creating their own logged in environments where they can monetize audiences on their own terms, making future monetization on the open web seem hazy.
GroupM’s Kieley Taylor and Amanda Grant are on the lookout for the future of identity in advertising
Between's the cookie's demise and Apple's anti-tracking moves, digital advertising's identity picture is still coming into focus.
Digiday’s updated breakdown of 12 publishers’ diversity statistics
A roundup of publishers' diversity reports reveals that nearly all of the companies included have majority white staff, leadership and new hires.
‘They’re solving a problem’: The Washington Post readies its Zeus platform for the buy side
Zeus currently offers more than 4 billion impressions per month across its participants' owned-and-operated sites.
SponsoredHow publishers are maximizing retention after the COVID-19 subscription surge
Michael D. Silberman, senior vice president of strategy, Piano For many publishers, 2020 was a good year for subscriptions, and the trend has continued into 2021. For example, over the last month, The New York Times grew active news subscriptions by 48%, and Insider has doubled its subscriber base to just over 100,000 in the […]
Why independent Black-owned media companies are not participating in agency multicultural marketplaces
Advertising agencies are launching new multicultural PMPs but some Black-owned media companies are refraining from joining.
‘We don’t have visibility’: Google’s ad targeting limits expose publishers with reliance on open programmatic market and first-party data weakness
Most digital publishers connect to Google’s ad tech in some way, but those reliant on open programmatic ad exchanges, and without robust first-party data solutions, could be hurt by Google's data decisions.