The New York Times has developed a new tech tool to determine which articles it promotes on Facebook and Twitter — without using those platforms’ tracking pixels.
The tool, called TAFI (Twitter and Facebook Interface), measures which articles draw the most social engagement with specific audiences, then adjusts spending to promote the high performers while weeding out the articles not attracting interest.
“In our test, it’s shown to basically perform at half the [cost per order] of a manual campaign,” said Colin Russel, senior data scientist at the Times who created the tool.
The Times no longer uses Facebook and Twitter pixels on most of its pages. Chris Wiggins, the Times’ chief data scientist, said that instead of using a reader’s browser history to gain more insight into the types of content they tend to read, TAFI looks at how an article has been performing organically on social and factors that into the data the Times has on readers’ interests.
For the past decade, tracking pixels on social media platforms was believed to be the only way for a marketer to achieve an effective and intelligent marketing campaign.
“We’ve been able to show that we can use our data without that sort of exposure of reader history via a tracking pixel,” said Wiggins.
Russel said that tracking pixels have been removed from all articles and browsing pages, though certain pages on the site still have them. Russel declined to share which ones.
“TAFI efficiently spends money on Facebook and Twitter, so they’re certainly benefiting because it allows us to achieve a very low CPO, which encourages us to use those platforms more,” said Russel. “We can get more bang for our buck.”
And because of the improvements in efficiency of tracking how well a campaign is performing, it also changes the calculations on how much money should go to these platforms overall, because the marketing team knows it’s not wasting money.
Russel said that the idea for the tool came around two years ago and was first launched to run international campaigns a year and a half ago. Then, a year ago, the Times pulled out of their third-party subscription marketing partnerships.
The goal for the near future is to use the homegrown tool on other platforms, such as Snapchat and Reddit, along with paid search and paid display advertising.
For many influencers, speaking out on Roe v. Wade is an obvious choice
Influencers are concerned about losing potential brand deals because they don’t want to work with those that don’t share their values on choice.
Gannett reviews employee blowback to social media policy memo after Roe overturn
After receiving criticism for forbidding its journalists from posting opinions on the Supreme Court striking down Roe last week, Gannett is reviewing employee perspectives.
Bloomberg Green’s expansion increases its service-oriented coverage
Bloomberg's climate vertical is adding new products and coverage areas to lean into solutions-oriented journalism.
SponsoredWhy the caliber of content is paramount for advertisers
Agata Brodniewska, brand safety manager, Dailymotion Content is king when attracting consumers but is equally essential when courting advertisers. While both stakeholders want many of the same things, they most notably want relevant content they can count on to deliver an accurate and honest message without confusion or misinformation. This is especially important for advertisers […]
Companies turn to employee resource groups to manage internal discourse around the abortion ruling
Companies are using ERGs to facilitate employee conversations, as well as executive leadership via companywide emails to employees stressing their support for wellbeing and the availability of managers for support.
Member ExclusiveMedia Briefing: The pros and cons of three commerce pricing models
In this week’s Media Briefing, media editor Kayleigh Barber breaks down the different pricing models that commerce publishers use.