The New York Times has developed a new tech tool to determine which articles it promotes on Facebook and Twitter — without using those platforms’ tracking pixels.
The tool, called TAFI (Twitter and Facebook Interface), measures which articles draw the most social engagement with specific audiences, then adjusts spending to promote the high performers while weeding out the articles not attracting interest.
“In our test, it’s shown to basically perform at half the [cost per order] of a manual campaign,” said Colin Russel, senior data scientist at the Times who created the tool.
The Times no longer uses Facebook and Twitter pixels on most of its pages. Chris Wiggins, the Times’ chief data scientist, said that instead of using a reader’s browser history to gain more insight into the types of content they tend to read, TAFI looks at how an article has been performing organically on social and factors that into the data the Times has on readers’ interests.
For the past decade, tracking pixels on social media platforms was believed to be the only way for a marketer to achieve an effective and intelligent marketing campaign.
“We’ve been able to show that we can use our data without that sort of exposure of reader history via a tracking pixel,” said Wiggins.
Russel said that tracking pixels have been removed from all articles and browsing pages, though certain pages on the site still have them. Russel declined to share which ones.
“TAFI efficiently spends money on Facebook and Twitter, so they’re certainly benefiting because it allows us to achieve a very low CPO, which encourages us to use those platforms more,” said Russel. “We can get more bang for our buck.”
And because of the improvements in efficiency of tracking how well a campaign is performing, it also changes the calculations on how much money should go to these platforms overall, because the marketing team knows it’s not wasting money.
Russel said that the idea for the tool came around two years ago and was first launched to run international campaigns a year and a half ago. Then, a year ago, the Times pulled out of their third-party subscription marketing partnerships.
The goal for the near future is to use the homegrown tool on other platforms, such as Snapchat and Reddit, along with paid search and paid display advertising.
Member ExclusiveMedia Buying Briefing: What a tour through Dentsu and Microsoft’s metaverse campus says about the future of digital marketing
Digiday gets a guided tour through Dentsu and Microsoft's metaverse campus, where clients can test out retail concepts or build showrooms in the virtual world.
The Washington Post invests in climate coverage as its team expands to over 30 journalists
The Post's climate team continues to expand as the publisher makes big bets on the beat drawing younger audiences.
‘Halloween is when Christmas ends’: A look at publishers’ pre-Black Friday commerce content playbooks
Publishers' Black Friday coverage plans are starting earlier and earlier but commerce teams are evolving to meet the demand.
SponsoredWhy cookie deprecation is deflating performance and inflating costs for advertisers
With the full deprecation of third-party cookies on the horizon, advertisers and publishers are navigating a challenging and quickly evolving landscape. The sunset of the third-party cookie continues as usage and lifetimes fall. Their deprecation is preventing brands from effectively measuring the effectiveness of media campaigns in real-time at highly granular levels. As the industry […]
How social media managers are coping with the Twitter debacle
Twitter – once a stable and trusty workhorse for social media strategists – now resembles the most wildly unpredictable social platform in the marketing arsenal.
‘A big reset in 2023’: After Big Tech’s mass layoffs, job candidates face intense competition
Recruiters report that 'we've never seen a market quite like this' as tens of thousands of employees flood the market.