Facebook’s new views metric has little impact on social strategy, publishers say
As a Digiday+ member, you were able to access this article early through the Digiday+ Story Preview email. See other exclusives or manage your account.This article was provided as an exclusive preview for Digiday+ members, who were able to access it early. Check out the other features included with Digiday+ to help you stay ahead
Facebook recently announced that “views” would be the main metric used to measure how all content is performing on the platform, combining metrics like “plays” and “impressions.” Five publishing execs told Digiday this new primary metric is just another way of measuring impressions, and the change has no impact on their Facebook strategy.
Facebook’s decision — which follows in the footsteps of sister site Instagram’s move to make views its main measurement in August — is another example of Meta’s focus on engagement on the platform (rather than sending users off to other sites).
“The signs that [social media platforms] have given to publishers over the last year is: our priority in determining what is a good piece of content is how many people see it on the platform,” said Wes Bonner, svp of marketing and audience development and head of social at BDG.
So far, the change has so little bearing on publishers’ social strategy that one head of social media at a large publisher told Digiday they hadn’t even had a chance to really look at what the change means (mostly because they were busy with Election Day coverage).
“I haven’t even gotten a chance to even think about the views metric,” the social media manager said. “It sounds more of an all encompassing version of reach… which is obviously one of our KPIs on platforms like Instagram, [which] has never been a major traffic driver for us.”
Bonner called the move a “rebranding” of impressions, or how many times a piece of content was seen.
“Rebranding them ‘views’ doesn’t really change the strategy, but I do think we have had to have serious conversations about looking at our view count — our reach, our impressions — and gaining insights on what does well [when looking at videos, image and link posts],” Bonner said. “We really had to unbuckle ourselves from having traffic be the primary KPI.”
Bonner said BDG hasn’t seen any major changes in the dataset on Facebook’s content dashboard since the platform announced the change, other than the “replay” metric disappearing. However, BDG has seen a “slight uptick” in the views number for images and stories posted on Facebook, now that the metric is counting duplicate views from the same person for those post types. “It is not significant, but we plan to monitor month over month,” Bonner said.
Facebook did not respond to a request for comment by publishing time. The platform’s blog post announcing the change said it gives creators “a single distribution metric for all content types that’s calculated the same way across Facebook and Instagram.” In other words, the idea is this change will make it easier to measure performance across Meta’s social platforms with more simplified data.
“This update provides an easy way to measure and benchmark Facebook and Instagram content now that metrics like ‘views’ are aligned across both platforms,” said Chris Anthony, CRO at Gallery Media Group.
More in Media
‘JG believed that even in a demanding industry, it was possible to lead with both rigor and humanity’
The industry pays respects to OpenX CEO John Gentry, who sadly passed away last week.
The Rundown: Google has drawn its AI payment lines — and publishers’ leverage is narrow
For publishers trying to navigate AI licensing, the message was blunt: Google is willing to pay for access, but not for training – and it remains unwilling to define AI Overviews as a compensable use of journalism.
Media Briefing: Google’s latest core update a reminder that pageviews can’t remain the primary metric
Google’s latest core update signals pageviews can no longer be the primary metric, favoring intent-solving publishers over scale.