Confessions of an Instagram influencer: Brands just want big numbers
Influencers have a fraud problem. Some social media stars, typically those with 100,000 or fewer followers, are known to use bots to artificially inflate their engagement. For the latest installment in our Confessions series, where we trade anonymity for candor, we talked to an Instagram fashion influencer who’s fed up with the practice. Our conversation has been lightly edited.
How did you become an influencer?
I’ve had varying careers. I did modeling and film work and gained a following from that, so I’m not the traditional influencer. A lot of the influencers brands are using, their one and only career is Instagram, per se. They paint this kind of fairy-tale life.
So how do bots enter the picture?
As the brands are being more pushy about influencers and agencies want them to grow their followers, they push them to use a bot that likes photos for you. A few years ago, everyone was growing organically. After brands started paying for things, these people realized they can sell followers to people. The brands use these fucking bots, too.
How has the subject of bots come up?
There’s all sorts of different social media management agencies out there. I’ve had meetings with people who want to manage people on their own, and they’ve mentioned to me that there are agencies that can help you grow your social media following. When you have to pay for it, it’s fake.
How well do brands and agencies know this is happening?
Brands and agencies are doing their research. They’re pushing for in-person meetings and information to look into your following. There’s so many things from the Fohr Card verification to verification on Instagram to do your due diligence. It’s very easy nowadays for a brand or publicist to click my following, 100,000 or whatever, and if every fifth person you’re looking at their profile’s new and they only have 10 followers, it’s very obvious that it’s fake.
Where are there still problems?
It’s the influencers and Instagrammers thinking they can fool everybody. I think it’s dishonest and sucks for the people who have grown their following organically. They’re taking money out of people’s hands [who have] worked really hard. There are content creators who work fucking hard, and there are people who have five followers and are getting jobs over them.
Do you think you’ve lost jobs due to this?
I’d like to think I haven’t. I’m pretty selective of the brands I work with and always push for meetings with the brands I work with. I’m not an Instagram model, per se. Instagram has just helped. But I don’t know what I’m missing.
What’s your take on Instagram beyond their attention to the bot issue?
With the algorithm, they chose what they think you want to see. If you’re following someone, it’s because you want to see their fucking photos. When I had half the following I do now, I was getting 6,000 to 8,000 likes and 2,000 comments a post. Now, my average is probably 3,000 likes. It sucks that you basically have this base that wants to see your work, and Facebook and Instagram say, “No, they’re not allowed to unless you pay.” They’ve overlooked the fact that advertisers pay people like me because I have people who connect with my work. But I get why they’re doing it. They want the advertising dollars. They should have just instituted a tax on people. I made $300,000 last year from all my activations, so if Instagram charged me 10 percent … that’s more than they charge five brands for an advertisement.
‘Show we’re listening’: Why agencies are lending office furniture, offering WiFi stipends to employees as new pandemic-era perks
With a hybrid reality in the offing, rethinking perks to include ways to make working from home better for employees has become a focus for leaders.
‘Shopping patterns will feel longer and flatter’: Gap’s CMO on preparing for holiday campaigns
Mary Alderete on the upended marketing calendar and Gap’s plans to lean into the extended holiday season this year.
‘Race to deliver’: Pernod Ricard CMO Pam Forbus on a new anti-hate speech initiative and how the coronavirus changed the company’s marketing
Like many marketers, Forbus had to figure out what to do about the Facebook boycott as well as how to pivot the alcohol giant's marketing amid the coronavirus.
SponsoredHow artificial intelligence and machine learning power content-first newsrooms
By Chris Nguyen, executive vice president, marketing at Naviga Digital is no longer just a nice addition to a newspaper’s success, but an imperative. While print remains a key source of revenue — capturing both subscriptions and advertising — spending too much time on designing and managing printed editions has become an obstacle to digital transformation. […]
As YouTube adopts new standards, the transition from brand safety to suitability is accelerating
YouTube is currently working on a brand suitability fix based on standards defined by the Global Alliance of Responsible Media.
Bridging AI to agility, empathy and purpose will accelerate marketing’s deep consumer and client relationships
IBM CMO sees important links between technology like artificial intelligence and natural language processing with human management traits.