Grindr’s digital magazine, Into, opens LA production studio for LGBTQ creators


Into, the year-old publishing arm of LGBTQ dating app Grindr, is offering itself as a distribution outlet for LGBTQ creators whose videos may be penalized by platforms that have a history of mistaking content featuring LGBTQ slang for hate speech.

Into has opened a production studio in Los Angeles’ West Hollywood neighborhood that LGBTQ creators as well as advertisers and other media companies can use to produce videos. The studio lets Into support LGBTQ creators and provides a potentially more cost-efficient supply of videos for its own properties. Creators will not be charged to use the studio but will need to agree to let Into publish their videos on its site. The idea is for Into to sell ads against those videos to make back the money it puts into the studio. Into also plans to use the studio to produce videos for advertisers, which would pay the publisher for the production and distribution.

When Into launched in August 2017, the publication opted to commission videos from outside creators instead of producing them internally, and it had an editor charged with securing that content. However, those independent creators often didn’t have anywhere to shoot their videos. So Into converted one of its two office spaces within the Pacific Design Center — a 1.6 million-square-foot facility that leases space to design firms, architects and other companies — into a production studio.

Into’s production studio removes that barrier by offering for free the space and equipment for creators, similar to how YouTube does through its various YouTube Spaces around the world. Creators are asked to email their video pitches to Into’s editors, who then assess the ideas and book the shoot. Into compensates creators depending on the project, said Zach Stafford, Grindr’s chief content officer and Into’s editor-in-chief.

In return for giving creators space, equipment and money to create their videos, Into distributes those videos on its site and social accounts such as Facebook and YouTube as well as on Grindr, which claims 3.8 million daily users, according to Stafford. Creators can distribute the videos through their own channels on YouTube, Facebook and elsewhere as well. Typically, creators are asked to cede ownership of their videos to Into.

“Generally, most content we create would be made with our ownership of the [intellectual property] because it’s living on our site, but we would be open to negotiating that,” said Stafford.

Creators may be wary of surrendering the rights to their content, in the same way that media companies are uneasy about giving Netflix and Facebook the rights to their IP. However, the videos that creators provide to Into may ultimately receive more views than they would on their own on platforms. Into has worked with Facebook and YouTube to get its content unflagged and would do the same for the creators it works with, Stafford said.

“It’s been an issue in the past few years where LGBT content gets flagged on YouTube and Facebook for being inappropriate — and understandably so,” Stafford said. “A lot of these algorithms haven’t understood the fact that like ‘queer’ isn’t always a negative thing, or to call someone ‘gay’ isn’t always negative. It’s really contextual.”

More in Future of TV

Future of TV Briefing: TV ad industry’s measurement mess gets closer to cleanup phase

This week’s Future of TV Briefing looks at what an industry group’s conditional certification of three measurement currency contenders signals about the TV ad business’s measurement overhaul.


Future of TV Briefing: The 2023 glossary

This week’s Future of TV Briefing offers an updated list of the key terms that can cause confusion when talking about the TV, streaming and digital video industry.

Illustrated TVs that evolve from a small TV to a larger TV in 5 panels.

Future of TV Briefing: The Disney-Charter deal signals looming equilibrium between traditional TV and streaming

This week’s Future of TV Briefing looks at what the Disney-Charter pay-TV distribution deal seems to indicate about the increasingly more-complementary-than-contentious relationship between traditional TV and streaming.