Why The Wirecutter lets other publishers run its product reviews

Wirecutter, which has drawn comparisons to the research-heavy Consumer Reports, spends hundreds of hours on its reviews. It’s a time-intensive process that’s tough for most publishers to replicate. That makes it inherently valuable and worth pitching to other sites, said Andrea Mathias, the site’s head of growth and partnerships. “Our partners work with us because they trust us and know we have the right expertise to make the right recommendations for their readers,” she said.

This is true even for gadget-review sites such as Engadget and Ars Technica, which have tapped Wirecutter to fill in their own coverage gaps.

“Here at Engadget, we review gadgets too, but we mainly stick to a handful of categories — you know, phones, tablets, laptops, smartwatches, etc. Even then, there aren’t nearly enough of us to test all the interesting stuff out there,” Engadget’s managing editor, Dana Wollman, wrote back in March. (The site declined to comment for this story.)

No money changes hands with the publisher deals, but the 4-year-old Wirecutter is using its custom product guides to both raise its profile and build its audience beyond the core audience of tech diehards. In 2013, it launched its second site, The Sweethome, which applies the Wirecutter approach to home goods such as bedsheets, trashcans and flatware. The site hopes that its expertise on this front will help it publish gift guides focused on topics such as running gear and bathroom accessories.

The Wirecutter’s custom product guides also serve to drive readers back to its own site. The bulk of the site’s revenue comes from its affiliate linking deals with sites such as Amazon. When a customer reads a Wirecutter recommendation and then buys a product, The Wirecutter gets a small slice of the transaction. So, the more readers The Wirecutter finds, the more money it stands to make.

“The primary goal is to get those new readers back to read those full reviews,” said Wirecutter’s Mathias.