The Times of London is wooing subscribers via a Brexit Facebook group
The Times has started a Facebook group dedicated to discussing Brexit topics, as part of plans to win over future subscribers.
The News UK-owned newspaper began the Facebook group last month after noticing a steady increase in comments on Brexit-related articles on its own sites. People are encouraged to share information from around the web in the group, which is called “52|48,” the percentage split of leave and remain voters. The goal is to introduce new readers to The Times content, while allowing people to post polls, videos, charts and snippets of reader comments from articles that sit behind the paywall.
Posts to the Facebook group that have had the most comments are this graphic on whether Scotland should break away from the U.K., with 29 comments, and this article on Europeans being blocked from taking jobs in the department running Brexit.
The Times’ team of five social media journalists take turns moderating and post to the group. The numbers are still tiny, with 150 members, but the caliber is high, and includes News UK’s political experts and editors.
“It’s about shortening the gap between those doing the reporting and the readers who we eventually want to make subscribers,” said Ben Whitelaw, head of audience development at The Times and The Sunday Times. For subscription publishers, like The Financial Times or Der Correspondent, offering access to journalists is increasingly becoming part of the package.
Since August, The Times has been experimenting with an open-access model, where in exchange for a name and email people can read two articles for free. It’s now topped 600,000 free signups, but figuring out how many will convert to subscribers is still being worked out. Whitelaw said it’s too soon to share details of how the group has led to signups.
“When before perhaps we wouldn’t have sought to engage those people [on Facebook] at all, now we are because we know we are an authority on politics and we have content people are interested in,” he added. “We need to reach out and find those guys.”
For the next six weeks, the focus is to drive numbers up while maintaining some quality of discussion. The Times is marketing the group within The Times’ comment threads and under articles about Brexit developments. Each time it does this a handful of people join the Facebook group.
The group has a couple of housekeeping rules to keep the discussion clean: People should post original content, evidence is needed to back up claims, and users are reminded to keep things civil. As publishers know too well, comment sections can attract trolls. For instance, the group description dissuades readers from using the terms “fake news” or “remoaner” — a derogatory term for someone who voted to remain. “We’ve seen these pejorative terms lead to a decline in the level of discussion.”
The group is closed, so new members must be approved, and The Times isn’t afraid of issuing warnings — which it has done several times — when discussions take an ugly turn.
Whitelaw said journalists have been more likely to get involved with this group than with comments on their own articles on The Times’ site, possibly because of the prospect of more exposure.
This is the first topic-specific Facebook group a News UK publication has started, but it’s likely to launch other groups in areas like fantasy football, from the expertise of its Dream Team journalists.
At the end of last year on The Times’ own platform it started moderating comments after they had been published, rather than before. This freed up more time for the audience development team to work on things like “52|48.” There was also an increase in the number of comments, as there was less of a time lag. Since January, eight out of the ten most-commented articles were about Brexit, this on Theresa May rejecting the EU’s demand for £50 billion ($63 million) and this on the resignation of the British representative to the EU, have both had comments in the thousands.
“We have a pretty well-behaved cohort of readers,” said Whitelaw. “Readers often don’t get enough credit for their insight.”
Advertising, mired in racism, has a long road to recovery
Companies need to respond to the racism row with genuine intentions or not participate in the conversation at all, anything in between can be very disingenuous.
‘The boundaries have broken’: Employers deal with the reality of workers bringing their ‘whole selves’
ven as employers have touted “bring your whole self to work” theorems over the past couple of years, it’s forgotten that that privilege has only really been afforded to a few. For many, bringing your whole selves to work isn’t an option. And the realities of the current work-from-home brigade mean that many haven’t been given a choice: When work is literally in your home, how do you keep it at arm’s length?
How publishers are changing branded content operations to remotely produce high-res campaigns
By using emerging technology like camera drop kits to ensure higher resolution content, branded content studios are able to ensure clients achieve brand safety.
SponsoredVideo: Marketers discuss the future state of less interruptive in-stream ads
In a new video, experts from GumGum, The Martin Agency and Pinterest discuss the future of video advertising — and outline their vision for how video ads can be less disruptive.
MediaMath explores a possible sale
The ad tech company is working with investment bank Centerview Partners on the process -- which could also include a debt refinancing -- according to people familiar with the matter.
With the latest crisis, media needs to back up words with actions
For the media industry, this was a week of introspection -- and a time of decision. For all the progressive ideals espoused by publishers, marketers and agencies, most fall well short when it comes to turning words into action.