Why subscription sports sites have scored early wins

Their growth is also an encouraging sign for publishers who hope to focus on consumer revenue rather than advertising.

“One thing that’s abundantly clear in our industry is that free is not a business model,” said Todd Dybas, one of the co-founders of The Sports Capitol, a Washington, D.C.-focused subscription site that launched this March.

The idea of a subscription-based digital sports publication isn’t new. Dybas, for example, released a paid iOS app for his coverage of the University of Washington’s football and basketball teams back in 2012. The market for people who will pay for local news is usually limited by geography, but sports is different because interest in a hometown team persists even after someone moves away. For example, 48 percent of DK Pittsburgh Sports’ subscriber base lives outside western Pennsylvania. Hook ‘Em’s national audience is also helping it sell advertising the American-Statesman can’t get as a local paper, said Steve Dorsey, gm of the American-Statesman.

Subscribers to sports news can demonstrate a high propensity to renew. Alex Mather, The Athletic’s co-founder, said the renewal rates among his publication’s subscribers are above 90 percent.

Related

Member Exclusive

Digiday Research: Publishers’ revenue streams changed mostly at the margins because of pandemic

To find expat fans, The Athletic uses Facebook advertising and retargeting as well as a referral program that gifts subscribers $10 in Amazon credit for successful referrals. DK Pittsburgh Sports, which got off to a strong start with Twitter ads, now uses paid Facebook ads and mobile app downloads to drive subscriptions.

The new subscription sports outlets will have challenges growing reader revenue. Like other subscription-focused publishers, they face competition from large, ad-supported established players, customer acquisition costs, churn and over time, competition from each other. Their content formats, like postgame rapid reactions, are easily imitated by competitors.

The bet is that they’ll succeed by serving their readers. While a few sites offer things like Periscope access to postgame news conferences and private podcasts, most of the sites focus simply on well-written, deeply reported written features and profiles. The Athletic gets reader feedback from one-question surveys at the bottom of every story and uses that feedback to inform its editorial direction, said Paul Fichtenbaum, The Athletic’s chief content officer.

“We’re intent on serving our audience, and we know what they want,” Fichtenbaum said. “We’re not interested in hot takes. We’re not interested in aggregation. Video is not on our radar right now. It’s not like the audience has asked for it.”

Direct feedback is taking other forms. Boston Sports Journal founder Greg Bedard said he is thinking about using a Kickstarter-esque system, where the Journal’s staffing and coverage will depend on whether enough people indicate they’d be willing to pay for it. “If we can get a thousand people to sign up for Revolution coverage, that probably pays for itself,” Bedard said.