The state of news subscription bundles, in 5 charts

subscribe

With ad-supported digital media companies in choppy waters, more publishers are trying paid subscription models. On Tuesday, Chartbeat founder Tony Haile revealed more specifics about Scroll, a startup he launched quietly at the beginning of 2017, using a $3.1 million seed round he raised from a number of publishers, including The New York Times. Scroll will offer readers unlimited access to ad-free versions of sites belonging to brand-name news publishers.

Scroll is the third foray into news subscriptions that the Times has participated in this year, and it’s not alone. In May, the document-hosting startup Scribd, which also offers e-books to subscribers for $8.99 per month, announced it would add news to its offering; earlier in September, Medium announced it would add curated articles from publishers including the Times, The Economist and others to the paid tier it unveiled this past summer.

Here is a look at the state of bundled news subscriptions, in five charts.

A tough sell
Historically, this is an idea that has not gained a lot of traction. While the share of people willing to pay for news varies by country, in most of the world, a majority of people are disinclined to pay for news. The picture gets even bleaker when examining subscriptions. In the United States, 8 percent of readers pay for some kind of recurring digital news subscription, a number that puts the U.S. in the upper echelons among select Western countries monitored by Reuters.

Outside of Scandinavia, digital news subscriptions remain uncommon in Western countries. Source: Reuters

But things may be looking up
In the past 10 months, there was a sharp uptick in digital payments for news in the U.S. following Donald Trump’s election. It’s worth noting, however, that a lot of the activity that fueled this surge came in the form of one-off payments and donations; the overall subscription rate for the U.S. remained steady, at 8 percent, also per Reuters.

The Trump Bump that paid news publishers experienced doubled the rate of payment for news in the U.S., according to Reuters research.

Little traction yet
The bundled products that many of these startups aspire to, Netflix and Spotify, routinely rank among the most popular apps in Apple’s App Store and in Google Play. But so far, many of these products are having trouble gaining traction, even in the news category, according to App Annie data.

According to App Annie data, no subscription-based news bundle app has cracked the top 30 in the news category in either app store.

The price is right?
With little traction in the space, a wide array of price points are being tested in the market. Inkl, an Australian startup that said it intends to become “Spotify for news,” charges 15 Australian dollars ($12) per month, while Scroll, which its founder said obsessed over the price, charges $4.99 per month.

Money to burn
That said, some startups selling bundled news subscriptions have plenty of cash on hand. Investments from major investors including KKR have filled the coffers of startups like Texture, which offers a subscription bundle of magazines, and Medium, which has pivoted from being a publishing platform into a membership-driven service.

https://digiday.com/?p=253633

More in Media

Walmart rolls out a self-serve, supplier-driven insights connector

The retail giant paired its insights unit Luminate with Walmart Connect to help suppliers optimize for customer consumption, just in time for the holidays, explained the company’s CRO Seth Dallaire.

Research Briefing: BuzzFeed pivots business to AI media and tech as publishers increase use of AI

In this week’s Digiday+ Research Briefing, we examine BuzzFeed’s plans to pivot the business to an AI-driven tech and media company, how marketers’ use of X and ad spending has dropped dramatically, and how agency executives are fed up with Meta’s ad platform bugs and overcharges, as seen in recent data from Digiday+ Research.

Media Briefing: Q1 is done and publishers’ ad revenue is doing ‘fine’

Despite the hope that 2024 would be a turning point for publishers’ advertising businesses, the first quarter of the year proved to be a mixed bag, according to three publishers.