Publishers face difficult tradeoff in making coronavirus coverage free
Reader worry – and work from home policies – are driving a surge in news consumption about the coronavirus, with pageviews up 30% year over year, according to Parsely data.
But publishers face a tough choice when it comes to using this reader interest. Even though readers are intensely worried in coronavirus coverage, it is difficult to monetize with advertising, with advertisers throwing keywords associated with the virus onto block lists. What’s more, as the scope of the virus’s impact widens, publishers also face pressure to move their stories about the virus in front of their paywalls, stunting a key area of revenue growth.
Approaches to this uncomfortable problem vary.
Some publishers are creating coronavirus exceptions for their paywalls. At Tribune Publishing, coronavirus stories are whitelisted at editors’ discretion, and they count toward readers’ monthly article limits, though readers who have reached their monthly limit can still read those whitelisted stories, a source familiar with the strategy said.
Some publishers are treating it as an opportunity to spread their content to as many new readers as possible. The Wall Street Journal began assembling a standalone section of free coronavirus content last month, with a running feed of news updates, a Q&A section of their site, and daily videos all available for free, without limit. To ensure that its coronavirus content gets the biggest possible reach, the Journal has been embedding messages in its coronavirus stories encouraging readers to share that content with their friends and family to maximize its exposure.
Others are extracting a bit more information in exchange for their content. The New York Times, for example, still requires that visitors register to read content on its site, though coronavirus coverage does not count against its paywall meter. The Times did not make an executive available to discuss its strategy.
Some business-focused publications have gone the other way. The Wrap, for example, which covers film and television, has moved more of its reporters onto a unit dedicated to producing content for the Wrap Pro, a premium subscription product it launched in 2018. Last Friday, Wrap Pro subscribers got eight exclusive stories, up from the two or three promised as part of their subscription.
Though not all of the Wrap’s coronavirus coverage is exclusive to subscribers, CEO Sharon Waxman hopes the Wrap’s most impactful coverage of the virus’s effects on industry can help drive subscriptions. The site launched a promotion this week that gives subscribers a free week of access to The Wrap Pro.
“Hopefully we become an indispensable part of their daily lives,” Waxman added.
So far, readers’ intense need for information has been good for business. Since pivoting most of its newsroom to focus on the coronavirus about two weeks ago, The Atlantic had its single best week of subscriber growth, even though their coronavirus coverage not counting against its metered paywall, Atlantic editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg said.
Stat News, a health and science publication owned by Boston Globe Media, decided to put all its public health reporting about coronavirus in front of its hard paywall. As a result, traffic has soared 225% over the first two months of the year, chief revenue officer Angus Macaulay said, but the site’s newsletter and digital subscriber rates have stayed the same as traffic has climbed.
And through the first half of March, the subscription start rate has more than doubled for the Seattle Times, which has had almost its entire newsroom covering the virus since it began spreading through Washington state, svp Kati Erwert said.
It’s not clear how long this wave of support might last, so some publishers are thinking through how to retain the subscribers they’ve attracted. The Journal is exploring the idea of offering lower-than-usual renewal rates to members it’s brought on with the help of its coronavirus coverage, said Karl Wells, the Journal’s gm of membership.
“I’m conscious not to be celebratory about this,” Wells said. “But I’m pleased we can offer something people need.”
Publishers speak out on the state of the media business at the Digiday Publishing Summit
With the calendar flipping to spring, do publishers feel like the economic conditions are starting to thaw or do they expect the second quarter to be similarly frigid?
How Forbes and The Daily Beast are consolidating diverse revenue streams to create the highest value audience
Forbes and The Daily Beast have shed the silo-model when it comes to how their revenue teams operate.
Media Briefing: Publishers share their biggest challenges and opportunities at the Digiday Publishing Summit
While Q1 ad revenue, sales cycles and payment windows appeared to be equally bad across the media industry, bright spots arose around consumer revenue streams, new tech experimentation and traffic patterns.
SponsoredHow critical data pillars will increase brands’ confidence in CTV
Mario Diez, CEO, Peer39 With every quarter, the balance of TV viewership slips away from the traditional linear model and more towards connected TV. Less than half of the adults in the U.S. subscribe to cable or satellite, and fewer than half of the households watched linear TV daily in the second half of 2022. […]
The AMERICA Act spotlights Capitol Hill’s ingrained antipathy for Big Tech
A reprised version of the Competition and Transparency in Digital Advertising Act spells trouble for double-sided marketplaces.
How BuzzFeed’s Creator Score is grading the impact of its creator network
BuzzFeed's Creator Network is a primary focus in 2023 for the publisher, and its campaign grading tool is being used to prove out its ability to create successful ads.