Google plans to commit to the IAB’s GDPR approach
Google will tell publishers how it plans to integrate with the independent industry standard for compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation at meetings on May 24 at four of its global offices, including London and New York, according to publisher sources.
Details are still to be worked out on exactly how Google will address some of the more tricky technical integrations that will arise from aligning its own ad tools with the Interactive Advertising Bureau Europe’s and IAB Tech Lab’s Transparency & Consent framework. But Google will put a time stamp on its full integration with the framework at the meetings — to be no later than July, according to people familiar with the matter. It will also commit to being an official listed vendor within the framework later this week.
“We absolutely want to be a part of the IAB framework,” Scott Spencer, Google’s director of product management, said to AdExchanger. “We plan to register.”
Richard Reeves, managing director of the Association of Online Publishers, said in a statement: “The ongoing dialogue between Google, AOP, and its members continues and the confirmation that Google plans to integrate with the IAB Framework demonstrates a significant step forward. We’ll always seek to work collaboratively with industry partners, and this is a great example of how our concerns have been listened to and responded to in a constructive and positive manner.”
Google confirmed the meeting will take place, but not the details of the meeting.
In theory, Google’s move to make its own ad tools compatible with the IAB framework is a victory for publishers, despite the fact that the framework itself hasn’t been an immediate hit with publishers. Many regarded it as a tool to serve the business purposes of ad tech vendors, at their own expense.
The IAB Europe has been working to rectify those concerns and provide more granular controls for publishers. But Google’s noticeable absence from the list of 166 vendors that have already signed up to the IAB framework — the only attempt at an industry standard for complying with GDPR, has unnerved publishers.
Even now, publishers aren’t convinced their questions will be fully answered during the May 24 meeting. In fact, many of the biggest publishers have not decided yet whether they want to attend the meeting. Instead, they would prefer Google to respond publicly to the open letter that media trade bodies Digital Content Next, European Publishers Council, News Media Alliance and News Media Association sent to Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai. Together, the bodies represent 4,000 publishers and have said they will not attend. Each trade body head has declined to attend the meeting. Google has since invited more publishers individually.
“We want them to answer publicly, so we’d reject any invite to attend Thursday’s meeting in any event,” said a U.K. publishing executive who agreed to speak anonymously.
The concern is that if all publishers agree to a closed-door meeting, they will receive vague verbal assurances and walk away with nothing in writing, according to publishing sources. Among the more cynical viewpoints: Google has arranged the meeting as a public relations exercise, but with no real intention of change.
The fact that two days prior to the meeting, many major publishers have not yet decided whether or not to attend speaks to the level of distrust between Google and publishers, exacerbated by GDPR. The law itself, so open to interpretation, has caused much confusion and last-minute scrambling across the industry.
Google’s GDPR stance, which it updated just weeks before the deadline for enforcement, has been regarded as an unwelcome distraction and pressure by publishers, who are still being inundated with data protection addenda from agencies and vendors with only days to go before the law takes effect.
“The meeting is likely a PR exercise by Google to demonstrate how they’re shepherding the industry,” said Jason Kint, CEO of publisher trade body Digital Content Next. “Why else hold a private, closed-door meeting on the last day before GDPR enforcement begins. There have been more than enough private discussions. Considering Google’s privileged position, it’s high time Google answer the questions of the industry rather than only serving its shareholders.”
Download our newly updated guide to GDPR, including recent developments, research, checklists and much more to know before May 25.
Advertising, mired in racism, has a long road to recovery
Companies need to respond to the racism row with genuine intentions or not participate in the conversation at all, anything in between can be very disingenuous.
‘The boundaries have broken’: Employers deal with the reality of workers bringing their ‘whole selves’
ven as employers have touted “bring your whole self to work” theorems over the past couple of years, it’s forgotten that that privilege has only really been afforded to a few. For many, bringing your whole selves to work isn’t an option. And the realities of the current work-from-home brigade mean that many haven’t been given a choice: When work is literally in your home, how do you keep it at arm’s length?
How publishers are changing branded content operations to remotely produce high-res campaigns
By using emerging technology like camera drop kits to ensure higher resolution content, branded content studios are able to ensure clients achieve brand safety.
SponsoredVideo: Marketers discuss the future state of less interruptive in-stream ads
In a new video, experts from GumGum, The Martin Agency and Pinterest discuss the future of video advertising — and outline their vision for how video ads can be less disruptive.
MediaMath explores a possible sale
The ad tech company is working with investment bank Centerview Partners on the process -- which could also include a debt refinancing -- according to people familiar with the matter.
With the latest crisis, media needs to back up words with actions
For the media industry, this was a week of introspection -- and a time of decision. For all the progressive ideals espoused by publishers, marketers and agencies, most fall well short when it comes to turning words into action.