Digiday Research: Almost half of US publishers are now applying GDPR standards to US audiences

This research is based on unique data collected from our proprietary audience of publisher, agency, brand and tech insiders. It’s available to Digiday+ members. More from the series →

Despite the risks it poses to their businesses, publishers have now applied its consent standards to their U.S. audiences in an effort to avoid compliance issues, simplify audience data collection, and avoid last minute scrambles to adhere to the new privacy law passed in California.

According to a recent Digiday survey of 91 publishing executives, almost half  — 47 percent —  of U.S. publishers are applying GDPR standards to their U.S. audiences

U.S. publishers implementing GDPR compliance standards to non-European audiences is a reversal from just a few months ago who were initially slow to realize to realize it applied to them, and represents a significant change to their business models from being reliant on audience-based programmatic advertising to contextual ad targeting. GDPR limits publishers’ ability to collect audience data which is critical for publishers and advertisers to target ads at potential customers.

Under the GDPR, publishers must ask for consumers permission to track their online behavior; something many users are resistant to accepting. In countries where GDPR is in effect, third-party cookie usage, which helps collect consumer information, dropped by 22 percent on average.

But applying GDPR to U.S. audiences does allow publishers to ensure they’re compliant and save themselves from potentially damaging fines of $22 million or 4 percent of their annual revenue, whichever is greater. At the May 25 deadline, over 1,000 U.S. publishers took the drastic action of blocking access to their sites to European users rather than risk being noncompliant.

Using GDPR standards across all audiences also makes technical sense for publishers. Rather than worry about constructing separate data collection tools and audience segments, publishers can create unified experiences and audience data through Consent-management-platforms and Customer-data-platforms.

Reasons closer to home could also be incentivizing U.S. publisher to adopt GDPR to their U.S. audiences. Now that California’s Consumer Privacy Act has been signed into law, publishers are hoping to avoid a repeat of the scramble ahead of GDPR.

Although the law isn’t a perfect copy of the EU’s GDPR, is has some similarities in that companies based outside of California are still responsible for the data of customers in California. Therefore publishers already applying GDPR’s data privacy standards to U.S. audiences could be giving themselves a head-start should they need to comply with California’s new rules.

https://digiday.com/?p=305289

More in Media

Can AI analyses about AI content reveal anything about AI and copyright?

Three AI companies share analyses about copyright concerns, websites blocking web crawlers and how much AI text includes protected content.

Research Briefing: Publishers bank on their own first-party data amid Privacy Sandbox concerns

In this week’s Digiday+ Research Briefing, we examine publishers’ reservations about Google’s Privacy Sandbox, how subscriptions aren’t the revenue driver they once were for publishers and how X is once again telling advertisers it’s serious about brand safety, as seen in recent data from Digiday+ Research.

How a revamped Green Media Product hopes to solve ‘problematic placements’

Scope3 unveils GMP+ with Sharethrough as debut partners to extend ‘Green PMPs.’