Digiday Research: After GDPR, U.S. marketers are more worried about audience targeting limitations than fines

Marketers are right to be concerned over decreased targeting capabilities. Facebook and Google have already cut back on the data they share with marketers causing headaches. Meanwhile the resurgence of contextual ad targeting and rise of programmatic guaranteed deals give credence to the audience-targeting struggles marketers are encountering. Without the use of third-party data sources, marketers are forced to re-experiment with previously uncommon methods of reaching consumers.

However the real reason why U.S. marketers are more worried about audience targeting can most likely be attributed to their lack of concern over potential fines. Just over one-third of European marketers said fines were their biggest concern compared to the 18 percent of U.S. marketers. The lack of fear over potential fines by U.S. marketers could be due to a misguided belief or wishful thinking that European regulators either won’t levy charges against U.S.-based companies or lack the ability to do so, though both assumptions are wrong.

As evidence that European regulators can reach U.S. companies, marketers should be paying close attention to Facebook. The U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office just handed Facebook a $662,900 fine for failing to protect users data in the Cambridge-Analytica scandal. Had the data scandal happened after GDPR had gone into effect, the ICO could have fined Facebook up to 4 percent of their annual revenues.

U.S. marketers that aren’t worried about potential fines could also be thinking that there’s safety in numbers. The overwhelming majority of companies aren’t GDPR complaint. Therefore many U.S. marketers might reasonably expect there to be little chance of them being punished since every other company would need to be fined as well.