Digiday Research: 64 percent of publishers are unaware if they’re on a brand’s blacklist
Digiday’s “Research in brief” is our newest research installment designed to give you quick, easy and digestible facts to make better decisions and win arguments around the office. They are based on Digiday’s proprietary surveys of industry leaders, executives and doers. See our earlier research on the European publishers preparing for the GDPR here.
ISIS extremist videos, Nazis and even political news in general are all things brand marketers are trying to avoid due to brand-safety concerns.
Some brands, like Allstate and ModCloth, were initially unaware so-called alt-right news site Breitbart was hosting their ads and were slammed by consumers for supposedly supporting it. This begs the question: Just as brands were initially unaware their ads appeared in unsafe brand environments, do publishers know if brands have blacklisted them due to brand-safety concerns?
According to a Digiday survey of about 80 publisher executives at the Digiday Programmatic Media Summit in New Orleans, 64 percent were unaware if brands have blacklisted them.
Advertisers avoiding objectionable content appear to lack a mechanism to have meaningful conversations with publishers. One publisher of a lifestyle site for women said exchanges have sometimes asked it to target away from certain content. However, it expressed frustration with its lack of leverage to change brands’ minds about what it was blocking. As a result, it reduced its coverage of sexual content from 10 percent to 2 percent in order to maintain those revenue sources.
Elsewhere, Mediasmith, which counts companies such as Salesforce and Nokia as clients, operates a public blacklist now 941 publishers long. Blacklists aren’t always perfect, and publishers often have no way of knowing whose lists they are on. In other cases, news about misplaced ads forces brands to act, as seen with Mars, Lidl and Adidas removing their ads from YouTube after The Times of London reported brands’ ads were appearing against content that exploited children. Google’s move to block ads on a page-by-page basis was seen as beneficial for smaller and midsize publishers, but publishers like the women’s lifestyle publisher mentioned above can still lose significant revenue depending on what they cover.
‘Walk before you run’: Sports publishers look to blow out their betting content
Over the past 12 months, several large sports media brands have signed partnership deals with sports books
‘It’s a virtuous cycle’: Audiences and advertisers seek health and wellness content and publishers are seeing green
Publishers are building new content products that give audiences more health and wellness content and advertisers more partner opportunities.
Election-focused products charge U.S. growth at The Economist
The brand's focus is covering the upcoming election, building up the leadership team and creating an aggressive three-year growth plan.
SponsoredB2B events were broken before the pandemic, their online reinvention is creating positive change
Kim Darling, executive producer, Inbound Farewell lanyards, business cards and branded pens — it’ll be some time before people get their hands on these souvenirs of in-person events again. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to transform the way people work, buy, sell, socialize and entertain themselves, the global events industry is facing its biggest-ever challenge. […]
‘Necessary, but insufficient:’ Advertisers are starting to question the value of low exchange fees
Large changes in bid price can often produce small changes in an advertiser’s ability to win those auctions.
‘One beat in an ongoing movement’: BET+ general manager Devin Griffin on the streamer’s evolution
Pre-launch research for BET+ found a lot of demand for content focused on Black stories and experiences, but 'the supply is not quite right.'