Unresolved issues take center stage at the spring Digiday Media Buying Summit
This article is part of Digiday’s coverage of its Digiday Media Buying Summit. More from the series →
Fluctuating budgets, conflicting goals and volatile consumer behavior are all creating new challenges to old problems that agencies say create tension with both the brands they work for and the platforms from which they buy ads.
At the Digiday Media Buying Summit in New Orleans, which wraps later today, hundreds of agency reps, tech companies and brands discussed the numerous opportunities and challenges that come with an increasingly fragmented ecosystem. Meanwhile, emerging tech sectors such as Web3-related platforms also still have unanswered questions when it comes to which platforms will win and fizzle out.
When it comes to data and measurement, media buyers say they want more transparency from various social networks — something they say is becoming increasingly difficult to get. That’s forced agencies and brands to become more sophisticated when it comes to other factors such as how consumer consideration and competitors’ ad spending can also alter businesses’ campaign results.
“Everyone needs to be aligned on a KPI that we can then put out into market and optimize better,” said Shelby Saville, chief investment officer at Publicis Media. “At the end of the day, that part of the process is what I would say is probably the most important part of the strategic process before you guild an audience.”
New tech is also creating new challenges for agencies and brands when it comes to data privacy. Increased experimentation around artificial intelligence and machine learning also presents new questions when it comes to what data is used to train algorithms.
Distinguishing data that advertisers can legally use from what they should or shouldn’t use is also leading to more nuanced discussions between agencies and brands. Will Ferguson, managing director of addressable solutions at Dentsu, said clients are asking more questions about sensitive types of data such as sexual orientation and health care information. New laws at the state level also add another layer of compliance concerns, but he said a national privacy law in the U.S. would help at least somewhat streamline what’s above board — even if ethical data-use questions remain on a case-by-case basis.
“The prospect of federal legislation is an interesting one,” Ferguson said. “I’m a bit of a skeptic … There’s part of me where I’m not too fond of the idea of a federal regulation, but I think it could bring some peace.”
Looking to technology’s near-term future, Albert Thompson, managing director of digital innovation for Walton Isaacson, said media buyers should calibrate today for the transition from Web2 to Web3. When considering attention metrics, he said those look different with Web3, adding that it’s better to shift from reach to focus instead on attention metrics that are more multi-dimensional and “resets the rules of engagement.”
“Everything is an experience — not a click, which is [just] an action,” Thompson said.
More in Media Buying
Holding pattern: Omnicom, IPG and the deal that’s leaving marketers on edge
How Omnicom’s proposed acquisition of IPG keeps marketers guessing.
Here are the numbers to know in Omnicom’s potential purchase of IPG
The acquisition is expected to yield $750 million in annual cost synergies within two years.
Omnicom’s acquisition of IPG could usher in a new, inevitable M&A wave
The $30 billion revenue combination will give the industry the equivalent of a megalodon shark in a sea of great whites and hammerheads.