Digiday Research: Snapchat is the hardest platform to advertise on
This research is based on unique data collected from our proprietary audience of publisher, agency, brand and tech insiders. It’s available to Digiday+ members. More from the series →
Both brands and media buyers believe Snapchat is the hardest platform to advertise on, according to new Digiday research.
In a survey of 63 media-buying executives at the Digiday Media Buying Summit earlier this month in New Orleans, Snapchat was chosen as the most difficult platform to advertise on, with 42 percent of respondents selecting it as the most challenging platform, while 27 percent chose Amazon and 9 percent picked Facebook. This mirrors earlier Digiday research from the Digiday Marketing Summit in December, where 28 percent of brand marketers indicated Snapchat was the most challenging platform to advertise on, ahead of Pinterest, Instagram and Twitter.
One media buyer at this month’s summit complained that “Snapchat’s platform [user interface] is difficult to use.” A common pain point for media buyers with Snapchat is measuring campaign performance. One respondent claimed it is “hard to track performance and lift,” while another voiced frustrations about the “lack of deep insights, ad options and tracking.”
Reliably targeting users on Snapchat has caused headaches for some media buyers. Alcohol brand Diageo had to pull its ads off the platform after discovering ads may have been shown to users under the legal drinking age.
All news for Snapchat hasn’t been bad, though. It recently beat Wall Street analysts’ projections and its self-service ad-buying platform has made buying ad campaigns easier, according to 16 media buyers Digiday previously interviewed. Some media buyers, such as Jeremy Sigel, global svp of partnerships and emerging media for WPP’s Essence believes the app redesign will benefit advertisers as well.
Media buyers’ gripes about Amazon similarly focused on transparency. One media buyer at this month’s summit said that “Amazon’s managed service has little transparency,” while another complained that “[Amazon] is not a self-serve friendly platform.”
Like Snapchat, Amazon is making efforts to improve its $1.7 billion ad business. Amazon is testing new attribution tools that will better measure campaign results. But for Craig Atkinson, PHD’s chief investment officer, Amazon already delivers on metrics. Speaking at a Digiday+ members event last month, he said, “[Amazon] just [kills] it on the metrics. If you’re a [consumer goods] company, you know exactly what happened.”
A common complaint about Amazon is the lack of support it gives ad buyers, who have described it as a “sinkhole.” But none of the ad buyers who selected Amazon as the hardest platform to advertise on in Digiday’s March survey mentioned customer support as the reason for their selection.
Check out our earlier research on how clients’ brand-safety concerns are affecting media buyers’ digital strategies here. Learn more about our upcoming events here.
More in Marketing
At the Las Vegas Grand Prix, Mastercard joins a pack of consumer brands flocking to Formula One
For marketers looking to align their brands with F1’s expanded appeal to audiences, the Las Vegas Grand Prix is providing a slip road into the sport.
Why PepsiCo and EA are expanding their partnership into mobile: A Q&A with PepsiCo vp of global sports and entertainment partnerships Adam Warner
The planned, multi-year nature of PepsiCo’s integration into “EA Sports FC” reflects that both PepsiCo and Electronic Arts are playing the long game as they look to step up the presence of ads inside and beyond EA’s portfolio of sports titles.
Key takeaways from Digiday’s 2024 Gaming Advertising Forum
Now that gaming has gone from a buzzword to a regular presence in brands’ media mix, marketers are more closely scrutinizing the value and ROI of their investments in this channel — and the platforms are rising to the challenge. Here are some of the biggest takeaways from this week’s Gaming Advertising Forum.