Digiday Research: Over half of publishers see the majority of ad revenue from programmatic
This research is based on unique data collected from our proprietary audience of publisher, agency, brand and tech insiders. It’s available to Digiday+ members. More from the series →
Over half of publishers now generate more revenue from programmatic advertising than any other channel. Fifty-five percent of 187 publishers surveyed by Digiday in November said programmatic advertising is now their largest driver of ad revenue, and 23 percent of respondents said private marketplaces or programmatic direct or guaranteed deals specifically are their biggest sources of ad revenue.
Publishers have proven their willingness to allocate their inventory to programmatic buying. Roughly two-thirds of publisher respondents in the Digiday survey said over half of their inventory is now made available to programmatic purchasing, signaling that programmatic isn’t just about remnant inventory anymore.
But pricing challenges persist for publishers. Sixty-eight percent said they receive less than half of their digital ad revenues from programmatic, despite committing much of their inventory to it.
As a result, publishers have turned to private marketplaces and programmatic guaranteed deals in an attempt to boost their yield and fight back against the downward pricing pressure that programmatic can inflict.
Seventy percent of publishers surveyed said that they expect to increase their revenues from PMPs in 2019. Publishers are also upping investments in advertising technologies in 2019, some of which could go towards improving PMP efficiencies. Seventy-six percent said they expect revenues from programmatic guaranteed deals to increase next year.
Creating PMPs can be a cumbersome process for publishers, however. Deals can fail to transact due to marketer’s overly specific targeting requirements or brand-safety tools that can limit the amount inventory advertisers can bid on, among other variables.
“With every PMP deal I’ve worked on, for example, the actual spend ended up being at least half of what the advertiser budgeted for,” said one publisher. Another respondent said, “It takes resources from us to implement and set up the deals and especially solve all technical issues.”
Publishers can also offer access to the first-party audience data buyers crave through programmatic guaranteed deals. In a post-General Data Protection Regulation-era where there’s a premium on first-party data, this makes such deals more desirable to marketers.
However, not all publishers are sold on programmatic guaranteed deals. A publisher who took the survey said it was frustrating that marketers “think programmatic guaranteed is a better way to do business than direct deals — from experience, it is worse for both performance and efficiency.” If publishers are going to lean increasingly on programmatic guaranteed deals, then these two issues must be solved.
More in Marketing
Digiday+ Research: A definitive ranking of brands’ and agencies’ marketing channels, where social reigns supreme
For brand and agency marketers, social media holds the top spot by far when it comes to spending and confidence that the channel drives marketing success.
As a 54-year-old brand, Red Robin is revamping its digital efforts with a cookie-less future on the horizon.
In this week’s Digiday+ Research Briefing, we examine how Snapchat is pitching itself as an alternative to current social platforms, how Priceline and other e-commerce companies are approaching generative AI, and how legacy programmatic media buying practices often disadvantage Black-owned media companies, as seen in recent data from Digiday+ Research.