Digiday Research: Pricing pressure remains publishers’ greatest programmatic ad concern
Publishers face many challenges when it comes to programmatic advertising, but the biggest is still the downward pressure it can place on their ad prices, according to Digiday research.
Digiday polled 185 publishing executives about their biggest concerns regarding programmatic ad selling, and 30 percent highlighted downward pressure on ad pricing as their primary concern. Respondents also pointed to latency problems and a lack of transparency with vendors as other key concerns.
In the past decade, programmatic advertising has allowed advertisers and publishers to buy and sell ads faster and more efficiently than ever before. But since its inception publishers have fought back against the negative effects the technology can have on their ad prices, with many arguing it’s resulted in a “race to the bottom” for the value of their inventory.
Programmatic can depress ad prices in a number of ways, including offering buyers access to an excessive supply of inventory, advertising fraud, high take-rates by vendors and middlemen, and the growing dominance of largely fueled platforms such as those operated by Google and Amazon.
As a result, publishers in recent years have adopted various tactics and new technologies in an attempt to maintain their ad prices. The introduction of tactics and technologies such as header bidding, ads.txt, private marketplaces and first-price auctions have all helped prop up publisher CPMs, but many publishers say they’re constantly having to run faster just to stay still when it comes to programmatic revenues.
But the reality is that many publishers have little choice in the matter. Advertisers and agencies increasingly expect to transact with publishers programmatically and are actively diverting more of their ad budgets to programmatic channels. Programmatic advertising will be responsible for nearly half of the $107.3 billion that will be spent of digital advertising in the U.S. this year according to eMarketer, and most publishers have little choice but to accommodate if they want a piece of those budgets. In a separate Digiday survey of 281 media buyers, 74 percent said they plan to increase spending on programmatic advertising in 2019.
Part of the problem according to Jason Fairchild, Chief Revenue Officer and co-founder at OpenX is that publishers are working with are working with too many supply-side platforms. He said, “If a publisher is working with 20 vendors to represent their inventory in exchanges, buyers sees a glut of supply from the publishers, that can turn into an availability bias against them.”
Fairchild added that because buyers see an excessive amount of inventory from a publisher, that leads them to lower their value of that impression due to the perception that because a publisher has so much available inventory it’s not that valuable or sought after.
Publishers have begun to take greater control of their inventory and are increasingly looking to forge direct relationships with advertisers, while demanding greater transparency from their vendors in an attempt to ensure their inventory is priced fairly and is not susceptible to shading practices like bid caching. Other publishers have accepted Fairchild’s view that fewer vendors are better and have begun reducing the number of partners they work with and some are already seeing ad revenues rise as a result.
Programmatic pricing impact of publishers inventory means that the goalposts for profitability are moving farther away for many publishers. Until those goalposts stop moving it could likely that pricing will remain a top concern of programmatic advertising by publishers.
With Roku leading the pack, study says 94% of households are reachable through CTV
Connected TV remains on the rise in programmatic advertising, fueled by the popularity of Roku, Samsung and Amazon devices.
Digital investors take time out as British Pound plummets
Don’t expect an M&A frenzy, despite Sterling’s historic low, as volatility cools investors’ appetites.
The New York Times looks to gaming product to grow subscriptions
The Times' use of games as a subscriber funnel is part of a renewed focus on gaming sparked by the company's acquisition of Wordle in January.
SponsoredHow FAST channels are redefining primetime opportunities for advertisers
Sponsored by Vevo With the competition from content providers continuing to build, the traditional primetime TV slots are no longer guaranteeing the mass audiences they once did. Television viewership is evolving, and the primetime window of 8–11 p.m. is less broadly reflective of younger audiences’ content consumption habits. In 2022, attracting TV viewers is a […]
Member ExclusiveMedia Briefing: The pros, cons of three pricing models for publisher, sportbook content deals
Publishers and sportsbooks are looking for new payout models beyond the standard cost-per-acquisition structure, which is priced on average between $200-500 per new customer.
Inside the NFL’s youth-focused social strategy
As part of the NFL Content Creator Network, the league is engaging with fans in new, innovative ways via gaming or just through creative social media activations.