Digiday Research: What marketers pay for branded content distribution
The majority of client-side marketers aren’t paying much to distribute content in their branded content campaigns according to a Digiday survey. Of the 31 client-side marketers surveyed at the Digiday Content Marketing Summit this August, six in 10 say they pay under $10,000 for branded content distribution on an average campaign.
If this seems low, there are a couple reasons that could explain why. The first is that marketers are increasingly turning away from social platforms for branded content marketing. Instead, they’re increasingly focusing on their owned channels, where distribution is free.
The second reason is that publishers are often footing the bill for distribution costs, when their own sites come up short on delivering campaign performance promises. And of course, publishers often wrap up distribution costs in larger packages that include things like content creation, making it difficult for clients to pinpoint exactly how much of their campaign costs are being spent on distribution.
Buying distribution on social platform is expensive. Limited organic reach on Facebook and increasing digital ad prices industry-wide only exacerbate the problem for publishers. More branded content is being done in formats besides text-based articles, like video, which is more costly, not only to produce but buy distribution for.
Branded content is an incredibly important source of revenues for publishers and one that executives are counting on for future revenue growth. But things like paying for distribution clearly eat into potential margins.
Fatherly COO Michael Wertheim noted in an earlier conversation that Facebook was an efficient driver of views for client’s branded content. That efficiency though might face some increased scrutiny following the platform’s latest metics scandal.
The cost of paying for branded content campaign distribution can also vary by what metric publishers agreed to in performance guarantees. Metrics such as views can more easily and more cheaply be gotten via programmatic exchanges than further down the sale funnel metrics like email leads.
Regardless, even if clients aren’t paying for branded content distribution, it doesn’t mean it isn’t costly.
In-game advertising experts question Microsoft and Sony’s gaming advertising plans
The importance of free-to-play titles is one reason why some in-game advertising experts are skeptical about the tech giants’ ability to succeed in their chosen business.
‘A lot of these brands need a reality check’: Confessions of a PR agency founder on agency ‘jumpers’ and tense client-agency relationships
Confessions of a PR agency founder on agency 'jumpers' and tense client-agency relationships.
Member ExclusiveMarketing Briefing: ‘This is a better way to travel’: Q&A with Airbnb’s global head of marketing on the company’s new capabilities, in-housing
Digiday caught up with Hiroki Asai to chat about the changes as well as Airbnb’s approach to marketing.
SponsoredHow marketers and retailers are unlocking the true value of retail media
Ben Kneen, senior director of product management, Xandr It’s a challenging time for retailers in the advertising industry. As they cope with supply chain woes and inflation-related pressures, they seek high-margin revenue streams amid evolving privacy regulations and massive shifts in identity solutions — including IDFA, the deprecation of third-party cookies and more. In light […]
The vast majority of marketers are unhappy with their Customer Data Platforms, but then again, not many are sure what they really are
Marketers are confused by tech vendors', well, marketing as the requirement for complexity grows
How the layoffs at Upcomer show the challenges of public ownership in esports media
Enthusiast’s lack of a seemingly cohesive strategy for Upcomer is a reflection of the broader challenges it faces as a gaming and esports holding company that is, at the moment, one of the few publicly traded firms in the industry.