Few marketers require performance guarantees for branded content
Less than a third of marketers and agencies are requiring performance guarantees for the branded-content campaigns they purchase from publishers, even as the tactic becomes an increasingly significant part of marketers’ strategies.
Of the client and agency marketing executives surveyed at the Digiday Content Marketing Summit in August earlier this year, just 31 percent said they currently ask for campaign performance guarantees from publishers. Such guarantees can be used to ensure campaigns deliver on a range of requirements, such as content views, click-throughs, time spent on page or email signups.
Some publishers have begun using performance guarantees to better compete for advertisers’ dollars. The Telegraph offers to meet certain brand awareness metrics, for example. Meanwhile, Forbes promises that for advertisers meeting certain spending limits it will refund clients their money if they fail to see certain metrics met.
But accepting performance guarantees can come with risks for publishers, including delivering a poor experience by using branded content past its shelf life, using up valuable inventory to meet campaign goals, or having to purchase traffic from third-parties. Such measures can quickly eat into the margins publishers can glean from sponsored content campaigns.
The ability for publishers to meet campaign guarantees can also depend on which metrics those campaigns are being measured by. Publishers are more likely to offer guarantees for engagement metrics than, hard sales, for example.
Ben Kunz, executive vice president of strategy, at Mediassociates adds, “[say] a client wants something like leads in the form of email addresses. It’s very hard for publishers to control all the variables that contribute to a person signing up so they might not want to take the risk of guaranteeing that.”
According to Barry Lowenthal, CEO of The Media Kitchen, campaigns more often come with guarantees around softer metrics such as time spent on page or completed video views.
Despite the risks publishers face, both Lowenthal and Kunz agree performance guarantees are becoming more commonplace. As marketers’ scrutinize their ad spend more carefully, many are now looking to performance guarantees to help validating their purchasing decisions and to compare the impact of branded content campaigns against other channels.
“If you look at Facebook, its performance guarantees are what’s driving interest from marketers. That’s putting a lot of pressure of publishers to move into this sort of arena”, Kunz said.
But even without performance guarantees, Lowenthal said that publishers are familiar enough with their own properties to make promises they can typically keep. Especially if they expect to attract repeat business. “A good publisher is going to have a lot of benchmarks, they’ll know how content will perform within a certain environment and if they can meet certain standards.”
For example, The Washington Post is able to track metrics like scroll depth and time spent on content in addition to its own unique scoring system for marketers. Other publishers including Hearst UK and the BBC are developing new metrics and tests to prove the efficacy of their branded content.
Marketers have also started to change how they view branded content which could result in different expectations. One anonymous attendee at the Digiday Content Marketing Summit said, “[working] with publishers to do content essentially means it’s a media buy, so it’s a lot more investment.” If branded content campaigns starts costing more, it’s reasonable that marketers would want more safeguards on performance.
Lastly, Lowenthal said publishers’ concerns over having to pay for content distribution to meet performance requirements isn’t pushing them away from accepting guarantees. “The client always pays for everything at the end of the day. A good agency is going to put boundaries around where the publisher’s going to get distribute the brand’s content. They’re going to make sure that they’re part of the conversation so if the publisher is buying inventory on an open exchange, they can ensure that the inventory is brand safe and good for the client.”
‘It’s a business risk to omit’: Firms slowly start to prioritize accessible workforces in their diversity goals
The pandemic forced a reckoning for businesses that denied requests for more flexible working and from people with disabilities.
‘Standard empathy tactics go a long way’: Confessions of a former marketer on motherhood and getting laid off
One former employee who worked in advertising reflected on burnout and what companies can do to support working mothers.
Member ExclusiveMarketing Briefing: ‘A lot of confusion and trepidation’: Marketers mull a ‘privacy-first’ approach amid looming Google, Apple changes
Marketers are left wondering how they will navigate the true loss of the third party cookie, especially after Google said it won't build an alternative.
SponsoredHow publishers are maximizing retention after the COVID-19 subscription surge
Michael D. Silberman, senior vice president of strategy, Piano For many publishers, 2020 was a good year for subscriptions, and the trend has continued into 2021. For example, over the last month, The New York Times grew active news subscriptions by 48%, and Insider has doubled its subscriber base to just over 100,000 in the […]
Google’s user-level identifier bombshell: what we know (and don’t)
Google is signaling aggressively that the era of direct consumer targeting as we've known it is ending.
‘There’s always money for avocados, but none for Black History Month:’ Confessions of a Black ad tech senior marketer
If achieving diversity and inclusion in the ad industry is a mountain then its one with the steepest of peaks according to the latest Digiday confessions.