Advertisers take a liking to 360-video ads
360-degree video is turning the heads of advertisers.
Google’s TrueView platform first rolled the format out for Chrome, YouTube and iOS in July 2015. But in the past few months, demand from brands has rocketed, and both platforms and ad tech vendors have followed suit. The pull for advertisers is the opportunity to own an entire screen.
James Hill, commercial director at video ad marketplace Teads, which launched a 360-degree outstream video format in July, said through-rates have been double the firm’s benchmark for standard video. Patricia López, head of mobile agency Mobext UK, claimed similar success. A recent 360-degree mobile video ad for an auto client saw an average of 40 seconds spent inside the creative. “That added layer of interactivity enables consumers to engage,” she said.
These formats have been a slow burn. For some, the issue was a question of scale. After brands had laid claim to being the first using the format (and the subsequent press coverage), there was a nervousness that their creative wouldn’t be discovered living on a Facebook page or YouTube channel. Still, 360 ads still have the novelty appeal that gets people’s attention.
“People are more time-poor than ever, so committing to an ad is a big ask for people. We need to make it valuable for them,”said Alex Smith, head of digital planning at Maxus Global said.
Ford will release an immersive video of its new Mustang later this month on Vice, GQ and other publishers. For Ford, the 360-degree video ad format was more accessible than going all-in on something like virtual reality.
“If it was just a VR program, we wouldn’t have done it,” said Ben Richards, chief digital officer for GTB, Ford’s agency. “VR is too cutting edge to justify its own piece of communications.”
Paul Mead, chairman of VCCP Media, said while 360-degree video ads often perform well once users are in them, it can be tough getting them to that point. In fact, these units have seen a similar initial conversion rate as standard video, he said. However, it is a step toward more fully realized VR experiences for both advertisers and audiences at a time when VR headsets still carry a social stigma.
“People are not always in the mood to play with a video and explore all its many possibilities,” Mead added. “Just because it is possible doesn’t mean it is probable.”
‘We’re letting Facebook grade their own homework’: Here’s how advertisers’ desired changes differ from overall boycott
The overall goals of civil rights advocates organizing the boycott differ slightly from those of advertisers.
How Facebook’s brand safety audit with the Media Rating Council will work
The MRC audit will determine whether Facebook has applied an advertising adjacency standard into its brand safety protections.
Member Exclusive‘Are you going to put people over profit?’: As Facebook boycott continues, DTCs still running ads on the platform in a tricky spot
The Facebook boycott is part of a larger cultural shift towards a more “values-based consumerism.”
SponsoredWhy data clean rooms are a start, but not enough
Clean rooms are intended to be a “safe space” for brands to collaborate with walled gardens, but the greater opportunity for all brands is bringing together all of their data to create a single source of truth that they own and can continually enrich.
WTF is California’s new, and potentially stronger, privacy law?
In November, California residents will vote on the state's second privacy law, which is basically the CCPA 2.0
As Facebook boycott continues, here’s a look at what major marketers were spending on Facebook and Instagram
To get a sense of how much advertisers are pulling back from Facebook, Digiday reached out to ad-tracking firm Pathmatics. The company provided estimates for how much advertisers spent on the platform during July 2019 as well as from July 2019 to 2020.