Blue Apron is hemorrhaging subscribers as it expands retail partnerships strategy

Meal-kit subscription service Blue Apron is losing tens of thousands of customers on a quarterly basis. To try to recoup some of that revenue lost, it’s focusing on getting existing customers to spend more, while recruiting more customers to the platform that are similar to its most loyal members.

The strategy includes prioritizing outreach on customer groups with higher potential retention rates and brand affinity, said CEO Bradley Dickerson. To do so, it’s linked up with outside retail partners in an effort to reduce standalone marketing costs: A partnership with Weight Watchers recruits members as Blue Apron subscribers, while sells Blue Apron meals and meal kits. The goal is that both and WW will offer access to customers accustomed to spending more on healthy food.

In the fourth quarter of 2018, the company saw a small lift in average order value, at $58.12, increase by $1.33 compared to the previous quarter, and average revenue per customer, at $252, an increase by $19 over last quarter. But net revenue decreased 25 percent year over year to $140.7 million, and as of Dec. 31, it had 557,000 customers — a loss of 89,000 customers compared to three months before, and a loss of 189,000 customers year over year. Chief financial officer Tim Bensley said he expects Blue Apron to continue to lose customers as it shifts focus to acquisition and retention of higher-value customers. It’s part of a pivot that began late last year, when the company shifted to a flexible service model, including distribution through retailers, and giving customers more choices, including quick changes to plans, meals that take less time to prepare, and limited-time, specialized meal kit offerings.

At this point, Blue Apron’s partnerships look more like lifelines. Despite the change in Blue Apron’s approach, analysts say the strategy doesn’t adequately address the business model’s core problem: Blue Apron is situated in an uncomfortable middle ground between restaurant delivery services and grocery stores, driving its potential customer reach to a too-narrow customer group. It’s the reason why other food delivery startups have struggled to scale.

Freedonia Group analyst Cara Brosius said Blue Apron’s efforts to move into retail distribution and flexible ordering options likely won’t be enough to make the business model sustainable. Blue Apron said it intends to grow its retail partnerships, and it’s talking to other potential partners. It’s also expanding its retail product selection. Starting Friday, it’s rolling out a pared-down $7.99 version of its meal kit called Knick Knack that will be sold through It will include sauces, spices and grains and other foundational elements of meals that customers can pair with store-bought produce and protein.

“Blue Apron has tried to expand its customer base with partnerships that offer more options for online ordering, but this has not been enough,” Brosius said. “The meal kit subscription delivery model simply doesn’t work for a lot of potential customers. Sometimes people want to cook a meal on a whim and don’t want to wait for a meal kit to arrive one or two days later from”

Blue Apron is touting its WW partnership as an example of how a focus on a specific group of customers — in this case, people who have signed up for WW — will help drive the business to profitability, which it said it expects to achieve later this year. Morgan Springer, co-founder of a now-defunct food delivery startup Sprig, said he thinks selling through WW is a good strategy, but the company’s broader retail plans, including kits that can be combined with store-bought groceries, carry more risk.

“The WW collaboration is a smart move — it’s a really focused audience with specific needs the product can be tailored to, [but] I’m skeptical of the ‘buy your own produce’ angle on the reduced meal kits,” he said. “At that point, they’re just another brand at the grocery store without a ton of experience in that game.”

Deep Dive: Amazon strategies

By going public in 2017, after raising nearly $200 million in venture capital, Blue Apron is an example of the risks that come with putting a next-generation retail model in front of quarter-by-quarter scrutiny from stockholders, the pressure of which could push the company in too many directions as it scrambles to survive. Blue Apron’s biggest hope, Springer said, is to go as niche as possible, like selling meal kits for parents with kids, or kits for specific diets. By going too broad, they risk not being able to differentiate enough to retain customers.

“Their core risk is losing the value proposition as they chase all these angles — ‘why I am buying this versus cooking or takeout?’,” he said.
Digiday Top Stories
  • Member Exclusive
    After a quiet three months, DTC brands resume launches

    After months of Instagram posts about how "we're all in this together," and turning their factories into production centers for masks, direct-to-consumer brands are finally starting to return to business as usual. That's particularly evident by the number of new startups entering the market.

  • Member Exclusive
    The dream of the DTC exit is fading

    Last week Lululemon announced plans to acquire Mirror, a connected fitness startup, for $500 million. It may give a false sense of hope to DTC startups about what type of exits are possible in this environment.

  • Member Exclusive
    How DTC startups fall flat in marketing their values

    Direct-to-consumer startup founders have found themselves in a number of unprecedented situations over the past three months -- from having to keep their company afloat while stores were closed to having employees confront them about racism within the company. Many of these same startups have also found themselves in hot water for how they responded to these situations. The issue at hand is simple: customers feel like these companies aren't practicing what they preach.

  • Member Exclusive
    As cities reopen, the DTC store strategy is changing

    For digitally-native brands, Soho has often been the first place for digitally-native startups to open stores. Now, it's a ghost town, and is indicative of the challenges DTC brands will face going forward in plotting out their physical retail strategies.

  • Member Exclusive
    As calls for improving diversity increase, many VCs are silent

    Over the past two weeks, there's been a flood of direct-to-consumer startups issuing statements about steps they will take to better support the black community, and build more diverse companies. But venture capitalists have remained largely quiet.