Publishers feel the crunch of cookieless browsers like Apple’s Safari
Google may have yet to deprecate the third-party cookie in its Chrome browser, but publishers have been dealing with the online tracking mechanism’s absence in browsers like Apple’s Safari and Mozilla’s Firefox for years. And they’re growing more and more impatient about addressing this issue, which was a focal point during the Digiday Publishing Summit in Key Biscayne, Fla., last week.
- “We have a lot to make up for in that space. So why not start working on it today and get our inventory valued to what it can be?”
- “If you have inventory that you’re putting into the open market that has no bid enrichments at all, if your inventory looks like what it does today, it’s not enough.”
- “Open market cant stay the way it is.”
“Already half of my inventory is needing this fix,” said Salon chief revenue officer Justin Wohl on stage. He then added, in something of a call to action to the publishers in attendance: “We have a lot to make up for in that space. So why not start working on it today and get our inventory valued to what it can be?”
When Wohl said that publishers “have a lot to make up for” in cookieless browsers, he wasn’t exaggerating. During one of the event’s closed-door sessions — in which publishing executives were granted anonymity for candor — multiple publishing executives lamented seeing ad prices for impressions on cookieless browsers like Safari be half the rate of third-party cookie-enabled impressions.
“You’re going to see a 50% delta in CPMs between [cookie-enabled and cookieless impressions] for the same ad unit,” said one publishing executive.
The publishers also pointed out how this Safari inventory, in particular, can be especially valuable, if only advertisers did not weigh the inability to track and measure site visitors via third-party cookies so heavily in their appraisals of these cookieless impressions.
“It requires the bidders and the marketers to put a value on what we’re considering non-addressable. It just doesn’t translate. And it’s crazy because some of the highest-value opportunities are probably the ones that reside in Safari. Yet we see half the yield,” said a second publishing executive.
So what are publishers to do? In short, they need to supply more information about the quality of their cookieless ad inventory, according to Wohl. Called bid enrichment, this practice has publishers adding data points — such as an impression’s estimated viewability score, the geolocation of the visitor’s device and the corresponding web page’s content category — to the impressions they put up for auction in programmatic marketplaces, especially the open ones.
“If you have inventory that you’re putting into the open market that has no bid enrichments at all, if your inventory looks like what it does today, it’s not enough,” Wohl said.
However, a challenge to this approach is advertisers trusting the information enriching a publisher’s bid request. If a publisher can claim a given estimated viewability score or content category without substantiating that claim with the actual impression, then advertisers will be likely to question, if not outright dismiss, the validity of any other publisher making similar claims. In other words, there need to be bid enrichment standards.
Enter the IAB Tech Lab’s seller-defined audiences specification. This cohort-based ad targeting method — which has publishers segment their audiences based on categories like demographics, interests and purchase intents — is one form of bid enrichment that incorporates standardization via IAB Tech Lab’s Audience Taxonomy standard.
Of course, seller-defined audiences still face skepticism among ad buyers and only provide certain information about an impression. Nonetheless, it’s a start at a time when publishers are reaching their wit’s end with cookieless environments.
“Open market can’t stay the way it is. We have to start putting in minimum standards for that inventory that lets buyers trust the open market again,” said Wohl.
We want to hear from you. Take this quick five-minute survey to help Digiday learn how to make our products even better and you’ll be entered to win one of five $25 Amazon gift cards.
Publishers speak out on the state of the media business at the Digiday Publishing Summit
With the calendar flipping to spring, do publishers feel like the economic conditions are starting to thaw or do they expect the second quarter to be similarly frigid?
How Forbes and The Daily Beast are consolidating diverse revenue streams to create the highest value audience
Forbes and The Daily Beast have shed the silo-model when it comes to how their revenue teams operate.
How BuzzFeed’s Creator Score is grading the impact of its creator network
BuzzFeed's Creator Network is a primary focus in 2023 for the publisher, and its campaign grading tool is being used to prove out its ability to create successful ads.
SponsoredHow critical data pillars will increase brands’ confidence in CTV
Mario Diez, CEO, Peer39 With every quarter, the balance of TV viewership slips away from the traditional linear model and more towards connected TV. Less than half of the adults in the U.S. subscribe to cable or satellite, and fewer than half of the households watched linear TV daily in the second half of 2022. […]
In graphic detail: Google’s Ads Safety Report shows suspect ad activities are on the rise
Google's ad transparency efforts detail how bad actors necessitate further investment.
Media Briefing: Publishers share their biggest challenges and opportunities at the Digiday Publishing Summit
While Q1 ad revenue, sales cycles and payment windows appeared to be equally bad across the media industry, bright spots arose around consumer revenue streams, new tech experimentation and traffic patterns.