Internet advertising has always been a tale of haves and have-nots. The bigger the player, the bigger the share of the pie. In mobile, it’s looking like the same movie.
Facebook and Twitter are each making moves that will put them in position to dominate the mobile advertising market by using their own highly engaged, large mobile audiences as a beachhead for far-flung ad networks. That means they’ll likely end up taking an even large chunk of the mobile advertising market.
Facebook is poised to unveil its own mobile ad network at its F8 conference next week. Twitter announced its “native” mobile ad network on Monday via MoPub, the company it acquired last fall. Meanwhile, Google announced its AdMob mobile ad network would now serve ads designed to get people to open apps they’ve already downloaded, an ad unit some say will becoming increasingly valuable as the app ecosystem matures.
Facebook and Twitter were projected to take worldwide mobile ad market share from ad networks even before these announcements were made, according to eMarketer. “[Mobile ad networks] are already feeling that pinch,” eMarketer analyst Cathy Boyle said. Now larger platforms are getting into the game, and bringing their troves of consumer data and non-banner (that is, more valuable) ad units with them.
“The whole mobile ad pool is getting bigger, but in terms of share, [networks are] going to have more trouble getting a piece,” Boyle said.
Facebook and, to a lesser extent, Twitter are renowned for their troves of user data, giving them a competitive advantage over mobile ad networks which don’t have consumer platforms. “They have first-party login data for targeting,” Rachel Pasqua, mobile lead at media agency MEC, said of Facebook’s forthcoming mobile ad network. “That’s the biggest benefit.”
Boyle said that while the mobile ad network game will be a three-horse race among Facebook, Google and Twitter, mobile ad networks that specialize in precise geo-targeting, like Placecast and xAd, will still be able to compete.
Another advantage for Facebook and Twitter in the mobile ad network game is their pre-existing relationships with advertisers, Boyle said. Facebook and Twitter have built huge mobile ad businesses in the past several years despite reticence about the effectiveness of mobile advertising. Convincing customers to throw money toward their new mobile ad products should be relatively easy then.
“Mobile can be intimidating to people who are new or not comfortable to, so people who can easily extend a desktop to mobile have an advantage,” Boyle said. “They have those relationships with the brands already, so that’s going to be an easier pitch.”
Twitter’s own ad products — promoted tweets, trends and accounts — are so often praised for being “native”; they exist within a user’s stream and appear similar to regular tweets and topics. Twitter is taking the same approach with MoPub. Rather than serving banners — the beleaguered ad unit that has become the bane of one man’s existence — MoPub will serve ads within its publishing partners’ content streams. Native ads are generally considered the preferred ad format for the limited real estate on mobile. Yahoo is so bullish on them, for instance, that it’s planning to abandon mobile banners and go completely native on mobile by the end of the year.
“Twitter is going to take native advertising to the rest of the mobile ecosystem,” said Adam Shlachter, DigitasLBi’s head of media activation in North America. “Native advertising powered by Twitter’s data is a differentiator that’s unique and not easily replicated by others.”
Facebook, which declined to comment, will initially bring its highly lucrative app install ads to its mobile ad network and then explore other formats. The movement away from banners and toward more native placements could be problematic for networks.
Shlachter argued that while the new entrants might make it harder on mobile ad networks, it will actually improve mobile advertising as a whole. Networks will have to come up with more unique, more effective ad units, thus providing more value to marketers.
“It’s going to be a game of differentiation,” he said, “whereas up until today, it’s been a game of commoditization.”
Image via Shutterstock
How agencies adapt as bots evolve
Social media bots may represent just a sliver of an app's total users, but it turns out they may be generating more content than we were previously aware. The challenge is separating the good ones from the bad.
Publishers feel the crunch of cookieless browsers like Apple’s Safari
Bid enrichment provides publishers the means of sprucing up their cookieless impressions to improve their value in advertisers’ eyes.
Why Hearst is building a commerce marketplace
Publisher commerce marketplaces aren't always successful, but Hearst's Sheel Shah hopes his company's new marketplace will capitalize on the natural evolution of its readers' online shopping habits.
Sponsored<strong>How marketers are responding to shoppers’ wants this holiday season</strong>
Matthew Tilley, executive director, marketing, Vericast With the holidays right around the corner, the economy may force some consumers to adjust their plans and stretch their dollars even further. While some shoppers may rein in their spending, others will still go all out despite a cloudy economic outlook. Given the current economic climate, consumers are […]
‘Death by a thousand paper cuts’: Publishers fret over alternative ID overload hurting site performance
Publishers lack the data to know which IDs they can afford not to support and are worried a surplus of IDs can slow page-load speeds and lower sites' search rankings.
Member ExclusiveMedia Buying Briefing: Separating agency progress from posturing around carbon reduction and sustainability
Could it be that the media world is finally taking concrete steps toward decarbonization — or will many of the efforts underway become the butt of a joke (or worse, the focus of an upcoming John Oliver segment)?