How Rich Kleiman and NBA star Kevin Durant are building Boardroom into a media business
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Stitcher | Google Play | Spotify
Many athletes have made moves into the media business, from Derek Jeter with The Players’ Tribune to LeBron James with Uninterrupted and SpringHill Entertainment to Alex Morgan, Sue Bird, Chloe Kim and Simone Manuel with TOGETHXR. That list also includes Kevin Durant.
Through their company Thirty Five Ventures, the NBA star and his business partner Rich Kleiman have been building a media business that has evolved from a channel on YouTube and show on ESPN+ into a media company called Boardroom.
“Boardroom was an evolution of us wanting to have a voice, knowing we had a voice but wanting to have our take and our point of view on the sports world and on what was happening in the culture around the sports world,” Kleiman said in the latest episode of the Digiday Podcast.
Here are a few highlights from the conversation, which have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
On pushing into podcasting
It felt obvious and most on brand for us to continue to expand Boardroom. We had clearly defined what Boardroom was; we now just have to grow it. But in order to grow it, we have to really define both Kevin’s and my voice within the brand. And Kevin especially just has so much to say and represents so much and understands so much about culture, around music, sports, fashion, art. That, to me, is what Boardroom is about.
On deciding not to dive fully into digital video
As recently as six months or a year ago, video content was just like — I thought you had to do it. Let’s create these video series. And then as soon as I saw that that wasn’t the right move, I just said, “Now let’s cut that” because I saw where it was going. It’s not about episodic videos that cost a lot of money. It’s just as hard as getting a show to pop on television.
On managing deals with brands that want to work with The Boardroom to get to Durant
It’s not even something that’s under the radar. It’s obvious and overt with most brands. And that is easy. That means that I can put a certain filter in place with a brand that I know that Kevin would never associate with. And if that’s the case, then I can say to a brand, “This deal’s for Boardroom and Boardroom only. If you’re not interested, then there’s really nothing to talk about.” But if it’s a brand that Kevin probably doesn’t want to align himself with, at least at this stage in the development of our business, it probably isn’t the right brand necessarily for Boardroom.
This article has been updated to reflect that Thirty Five Ventures has dropped “The” from Boardroom’s name.
More in Media
After an oversaturation of AI-generated content, creators’ authenticity and ‘messiness’ are in high demand
Content creators and brand marketing specialists on how 2026 will be the year creator authenticity becomes even more crucial in the face of rampant AI-generated “slop” flooding social media platforms.
‘The net is tightening’ on AI scraping: Annotated Q&A with Financial Times’ head of global public policy and platform strategy
Matt Rogerson, FT’s director of global public policy and platform strategy, believes 2026 will bring a kind of reset as big tech companies alter their stance on AI licensing to avoid future legal risk.
Future starts to sharpen its AI search visibility playbook
Future is boosting AI search citations and mentions with a tool called Future Optic, and offering the product to branded content clients.