Over the past year, Spotify has dominated the podcast news space with headlines about big investments in new shows hosted by A-list celebrities. But over the past few weeks, it has been caught off-guard by a crop of counterfeit shows distributed by its hosting platform, Anchor, the podcast hosting and distribution platform Spotify acquired in 2019.
Over the past couple weeks, podcast creators have been grumbling that Anchor, which allows anybody to create and distribute podcasts for free, has allowed shady creators to distribute dozens of shows with the same names as popular podcasts, including “Serial,” “Call Her Daddy,” “Office Ladies” and “The Joe Rogan Experience” to be distributed across the podcast ecosystem. Podnews spotted the fake shows earlier this week.
While many popular podcast players, including Apple’s and Google’s, typically surface the popular, original shows first in their search results, the Anchor-hosted copycats appear too, in many cases with nearly identical metadata and cover art. The fake shows appear designed to trick listeners into listening to them, so they can be monetized through ads injected automatically using Anchor technology.
On Anchor’s own app, the problem is even worse, with the namesake show rarely appearing at the top of results. A user hunting for the podcast “Serial,” for example, would have to scroll past nearly a dozen fake shows before finding the show that brought podcasting into the mainstream.
The problem inside Anchor’s app is far down the list of creators’ concerns; Anchor’s app is responsible for a negligible amount of podcast consumption, said Dave Zohrob, the founder of the podcast analytics and ad attribution service Chartable.
But the confusion this has caused has incensed several creators, who say the phony shows have the potential to create confusion among potential listeners, degrade the listening experience on different apps, and possibly cost them money: A copycat podcaster can create a show on Anchor, upload it to Spotify, then use Spotify’s automatic ad injection to monetize a confused listener.
“It’s growing Anchor’s business at our expense,” said Barstool Sports CEO Erika Nardini, who catalogued several different examples of the fakes on Twitter. Nardini said Barstool’s attempts to contact Anchor to resolve the problem were met with radio silence.
Reached for comment, a Spotify spokesperson said that the offending shows were taken down, and sent a statement.
“We take intellectual property infringement activity extremely seriously,” the statement read. “Spotify has multiple detection measures in place monitoring fraud on the service to detect, investigate and deal with such activity. We are continuing to invest heavily in refining those processes and improving methods of detection and removal, and reducing the impact of this unacceptable activity on legitimate creators, rights holders and our users.”
As of Aug. 20, some of the shows are still available on competitors’ apps, such as Google Podcasts, though a lag in when those apps update their RSS feeds may be responsible for the disparity.
Anchor provides a lot of the scale and raw material that helped turn Spotify into one of the largest podcasting platforms. Founded in 2015 by Michael Mignano and Nir Zicherman, the service was hosting 15 billion hours’ worth of content at the end of 2018, according to a note Spotify CEO Daniel Ek published last year. As of the second quarter of 2020, Spotify has 1.5 million podcasts on its platform.
It has caused other problems for Spotify in the past. Last summer, Podnews reported that Anchor users were using the platform to illegally distribute music, a striking black eye for a company that positioned itself as a bulwark against recorded music piracy almost a decade ago.
The news that Spotify had taken down the fake shows did not mollify many of the sources contacted for this story, who say that Spotify has given podcasters no indication that they have resources or technology in place to keep this from becoming a game of whack-a-mole.
“It strikes me as something Spotify is not prepared for,” a source inside Stitcher said. “A platform like YouTube is good at finger-printing content. If your copyright is infringed, you actually have a lot of options.
“I don’t think they are very well-equipped to handle this.”
Gannett reviews employee blowback to social media policy memo after Roe overturn
After receiving criticism for forbidding its journalists from posting opinions on the Supreme Court striking down Roe last week, Gannett is reviewing employee perspectives.
Companies turn to employee resource groups to manage internal discourse around the abortion ruling
Companies are using ERGs to facilitate employee conversations, as well as executive leadership via companywide emails to employees stressing their support for wellbeing and the availability of managers for support.
Member ExclusiveMedia Briefing: The pros and cons of three commerce pricing models
In this week’s Media Briefing, media editor Kayleigh Barber breaks down the different pricing models that commerce publishers use.
SponsoredWhy the caliber of content is paramount for advertisers
Agata Brodniewska, brand safety manager, Dailymotion Content is king when attracting consumers but is equally essential when courting advertisers. While both stakeholders want many of the same things, they most notably want relevant content they can count on to deliver an accurate and honest message without confusion or misinformation. This is especially important for advertisers […]
Bloomberg Green’s expansion increases its service-oriented coverage
Bloomberg's climate vertical is adding new products and coverage areas to lean into solutions-oriented journalism.
Vice Media Group brings back program for small, Black-owned businesses
VMG and the National Urban League are bringing back their program offering marketing and consulting services to Black-owned businesses -- to a smaller group.