It has become a normal part of parenthood to share the experience online, whether it’s photo’s of the baby’s first bath, a video clip of a child’s first words, or a status update about a diaper situation. Babies are on Facebook long before they know what the social Web is. Steven Leckart, a new parent himself, isn’t sure if that’s a good thing. As he writes in his article for The Wall Street Journal, “The Facebook-Free Baby,” he is making the decision not to put his baby on Facebook so that his child can make the choice if and when to create an online identity. Leckart explains:
As more of Gen-C begins having kids, I suspect they’ll agree. In the last decade, we’ve watched parents embrace social media, often too much. I call it “oversharenting”: the tendency for parents to share a lot of information and photos of their kids online. Sure, there’s a big difference between announcing your baby’s first crawl and details of your dirty-diaper duty (or worse). But it’s a slippery slope.
Read the full article here.
More in Media
How a fitness creator built her own global wellness platform
Gabby George leveraged her social media success into a subscription-based fitness platform to diversify revenue.
Time has started serving ads to AI agents
Time is selling ads targeting AI bots, betting that markdown pages will make its content (and advertisers) more visible in AI search.
Media Briefing: Threatening to quit Google’s crawlers is just publishers’ new hope
Bold Call: Google’s AI era is fueling fresh calls for publishers to cut off access to their content, but dependence on search still holds most back.