Lock in a year of Digiday+ for 35% less.
It has become a normal part of parenthood to share the experience online, whether it’s photo’s of the baby’s first bath, a video clip of a child’s first words, or a status update about a diaper situation. Babies are on Facebook long before they know what the social Web is. Steven Leckart, a new parent himself, isn’t sure if that’s a good thing. As he writes in his article for The Wall Street Journal, “The Facebook-Free Baby,” he is making the decision not to put his baby on Facebook so that his child can make the choice if and when to create an online identity. Leckart explains:
As more of Gen-C begins having kids, I suspect they’ll agree. In the last decade, we’ve watched parents embrace social media, often too much. I call it “oversharenting”: the tendency for parents to share a lot of information and photos of their kids online. Sure, there’s a big difference between announcing your baby’s first crawl and details of your dirty-diaper duty (or worse). But it’s a slippery slope.
Read the full article here.
More in Media
Omnicom’s ‘fewer middlemen’ push is reaching publishers – just not their P&Ls
Omnicom’s drive to “reduce middlemen” is showing up in how its agencies talk to publishers.
Bleacher Report launches YouTube channel for its sports cartoon fanbase ahead of World Cup
Bleacher Report is betting on animated sports content and YouTube distribution to capture World Cup fans and young viewers.
WTF is viewbotting?
Viewbotting artificially inflates livestream views, but it doesn’t just affect streamers. What is the practice and why are brands and platforms concerned?