Join us Dec. 1-3 in Nashville for the Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit
It has become a normal part of parenthood to share the experience online, whether it’s photo’s of the baby’s first bath, a video clip of a child’s first words, or a status update about a diaper situation. Babies are on Facebook long before they know what the social Web is. Steven Leckart, a new parent himself, isn’t sure if that’s a good thing. As he writes in his article for The Wall Street Journal, “The Facebook-Free Baby,” he is making the decision not to put his baby on Facebook so that his child can make the choice if and when to create an online identity. Leckart explains:
As more of Gen-C begins having kids, I suspect they’ll agree. In the last decade, we’ve watched parents embrace social media, often too much. I call it “oversharenting”: the tendency for parents to share a lot of information and photos of their kids online. Sure, there’s a big difference between announcing your baby’s first crawl and details of your dirty-diaper duty (or worse). But it’s a slippery slope.
Read the full article here.
More in Media
People Inc. is building custom APIs to make its journalism easier for AI agents to use
People Inc. is moving toward custom APIs for AI systems, Forbes has adopted Markdown for agents, while the FT, Daily Mail are considering how agents could reach content for subscribers.
Giggly Squad’s SiriusXM deal signals a shift from podcast networks to creator ecosystems
The Giggly Squad deal shows podcasts have turned another corner. Video, short-form, IRL shows…where does the podcast go from here?
The Times of London is gearing up to test ‘macro payments’
The Times has a plan for readers who don’t want to subscribe.