Oddly enough, Twitter has become the go-to forum for Facebook execs as the platform battles pushback over algorithm changes, spammy ads and the spread of misinformation. It’s a shift for Facebook, which, like other tech companies, has been known for having a tightly controlled PR strategy. It’s also an acknowledgment that Twitter is beloved by one of its core constituents, journalists, and is a more effective way to respond to critics in real time than Facebook itself.

In recent weeks, Facebook execs have used Twitter to promote changes to its news feed and ad policies, argue with its critics and take jabs at rival platforms. Facebook’s public relations team is aware of the execs’ tweeting but isn’t coordinating it; the loosened approach does go hand-in-hand with the company’s sending people in operational roles out to meet with publishers to improve relations with media companies as part of the Facebook Journalism Project.

Facebook product vp Adam Mosseri, whose core responsibility is the news feed, has been active on the platform, where he has 21,000 followers, to handle reaction to Facebook’s January announcements that it would reduce the amount of news people see in their feeds.

Rob Leathern, a Facebook product director brought on in 2017 to improve trust in Facebook’s business products, used Twitter, where he has 11,000 followers, to promote Facebook’s new ads policy. At other times, Leathern, a longtime online ad expert and founder of Optimal.com, a consumer-paid ad-blocking service, has called out online scam artists and other scourges of digital media.

Leathern seems to understand that Facebook’s policies won’t necessarily work perfectly, and he cheerfully offered to answer questions about the ads policy as the company starts enforcing it.

Other Facebook execs are less diplomatic on Twitter.

Andrew “Boz” Bosworth, vp of augmented reality and virtual reality at Facebook (6,000 Twitter followers), has defended Facebook’s actions during the 2016 U.S. election on Twitter but has lately used his account to promote Facebook products and take jabs at journalists and critics over whether Facebook sells user data to advertisers.

Facebook security chief Alex Stamos (27,000 Twitter followers) made news last October for his multipart tweetstorm defending Facebook against criticism of its efforts to deal with the spread of misinformation on the platform.

In November, he sparred with reporters over user safety on Facebook.

In January, he came out swinging again, defending the tech elite from the media stereotype of them as arrogant, flagrant-spending bros.

Another staunch defender of the Facebook cause is Rob Goldman, vp of ads (1,500 followers).

When Goldman isn’t promoting Facebook’s products, he uses his account to take shots at Apple, Snapchat and Twitter over various privacy, age-targeting and mobile payment issues. Hey, no one accused Twitter of being a place for diplomacy and nuance.

The Twitter action is generally going over well with critics, though, many of whom have seen the company as remote and uncommunicative.

“I think it’s a great trend when tech execs in general make themselves more available, especially when it’s across a variety of platforms outside of just their own product,” said Hunter Walk, a former Google and YouTube exec who now runs venture capital firm Homebrew. “Be human, be accessible. Listen, in addition to talk. It goes a long way toward helping those outside of these companies realize that real flesh-and-blood people with good intentions are behind the decisions and products we critique.”

Any effort by Facebook to communicate with the outside world is good, and Leathern strikes a good tone, but time will tell if it leads to any action, said the person behind the anonymous Twitter account Sleeping Giants, which calls out advertising on racist and sexist websites.

“We have been asking Facebook for a year why they continue to serve their customers’ ads on Breitbart despite clear breaches of their community standards, and we have gotten no answers,” this person said. “On top of it, many of their customers who have already blocked that particular site end up showing up again, which is infuriating for them. Facebook has been lousy at communicating their plans, so we’re obviously hopeful that Rob, though social media channels, can start to be more responsive. It’s going to take a lot more than a few people on social media to change things over there, though, we suspect.”

We asked Leathern (via Twitter, of course) to respond; he referred the question to Facebook PR, which sent over this statement from its Audience Network team: “Advertisers who participate in Audience Network have control over where their ads appear. If they don’t want their ads to appear on a specific site or app, that’s their choice and they can block them. And not all disagreeable or unpopular speech violates our Community Standards or Audience Network policies. We review all publishers on the Audience Network both proactively when they sign up and reactively as they run ads through the Audience Network to make sure they are not in violation.”

  • LinkedIn Icon