Advertising is awash with agencies proclaiming their love for startups and all things innovation, but all too often, there’s not much behind the fancy talk. In our latest Confessions, in which we exchange anonymity for honesty, the former innovation boss for a well-known advertising agency reveals why so many creative shops roll out innovation labs. Here’s our conversation, lightly edited for clarity.
There’s so much talk about why innovation is important to agencies. Why are so many not taking it seriously?
The agencies that have to adhere to shareholders are buttoning down costs as they have been doing for some time, meaning it’s more about appeasing the shareholders with monthly figures. If you are a back-end entity that’s part of the back-end costs at an agency, it’s harder to get it [innovation] paid for by clients. Therefore, innovation expertise is seen as a drag to the company, which is made worse due to the lack of tangible measures for them to know that it has a long-term effect. So many times recently, we’ve witnessed “shiny new toy” syndrome in both clients and agencies. And you can add to that some very short-term thinking. Clients tackling the wrong challenges and not dealing with the causes but the effects.
Just because it’s harder to quantify innovation doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t do it.
There are certain CEOs that have an appetite for innovation, and there are others that can’t see a need to invest in it because it doesn’t affect their day job. You can spot the difference between the two by whether the agency boss has insisted on a set of robust KPIs. When there’s a clearly defined set of KPIs against the word innovation — which means anything that is bigger, better, stronger and different — then you’re able to see a lot of growth. The way forward is almost certainly a hybrid model but heavily grounded in client outcomes and metrics and based on models that promote mutual value — unlike many of the traditional agency models.
Are the agencies without KPIs for innovation just doing it to win additional budgets from clients?
It’s all smoke and mirrors to get more money. Outwardly, agencies will have an innovation hub or an in-house specialist to look trendy and forward-thinking, but actually, they’re just delivering a business that hasn’t changed in 60 years. I’m seeing so many agencies doing exactly the same as they’ve always done.
So agencies are using innovation to mask shortcomings elsewhere in the business?
Look at Publicis Groupe, for example. The group has announced it won’t be spending any money on awards so that they can concentrate on the artificial intelligence they’re building — Marcel — to benefit the company and its clients. But it could be smoke and mirrors. It could be that they don’t want to spend money on awards, and so, therefore, they’ve decided to put out a PR story about putting money into startups, whereas it’s easier to see the more money that goes into awards.
How are brands responding to this?
Clients, [on the whole], are much wiser as to how agencies make their money — technology means it is all transparent, no smoke and mirrors — and have many more direct alternatives coming to them via all means on social media. They are looking for evidence-based solutions and are not always convinced by superficial partnerships or cobbled-together alliances.
How can agencies fix that issue?
It is still not seen as mission-critical with most CEOs to make the changes needed to truly innovate. It is enough for them to “sprinkle innovation and new and shiny pixie dust” to make their clients happy. The clients are not brave either in terms of buying innovative work. But most of all, many companies don’t realize it is all part of business transformation, and when they see what would need to be done to really embed innovation or innovative thinking at the heart of their company, it is just too difficult for them to get their heads around — hence so many disrupters out there disrupting the existing models, a la Uber, Airbnb, etc. The new models of agile nimble players are coming through.
Amid gloomy forecasts can ad tech weather the storm?
The recent Q2 results suggest there is more resilience and runway in the ad tech sector. But how long before push comes to shove?
Media Briefing: What Axios’ sale says about the valuation of digital media companies
In this week’s Media Briefing, senior media reporter Sara Guaglione looks at what Axios's sale to Cox Enterprises signals about the current investment market for media companies.
Member ExclusiveDigiday+ Research deep dive: Twitter’s strength holds among publishers
There is perhaps no social media platform that is more appropriate for publishers than Twitter. In this Digiday+ Research deep dive, we look at why this is.
SponsoredWhat gaming habits reveal about media consumption
Jordan Shlacter, head of research, Activision Blizzard Media Entertainment choices have never been more abundant, and gaming has emerged as one of the biggest winners in the battle for audiences’ attention. While gaming’s exponential growth has been well documented — there are currently nearly 3 billion gamers worldwide spanning a diverse set of demographics, interests […]
La razón por la que Google y Samsung se asociaron con la personalidad de TikTok Addison Rae para una campaña nostálgica de los años 90
Este verano, Google y Samsung han lanzado su último esfuerzo de marketing conjunto, en el que los gigantes de la tecnología y el hardware aprovechan la nostalgia de principios de los años 90 y utilizan a la TikToker Addison Rae como musa de la generación Z. En su nueva campaña publicitaria con Rae, Google cuenta […]
Las publicaciones invierten en más reporteros especializados en criptomonedas
La semana en que el mercado de las criptomonedas se desplomó a mediados de junio, Fortune envió a Jeff Roberts una oferta para convertirse en su editor de criptografía y supervisar la creación de un equipo de periodistas. Estas circunstancias llevaron a la redactora jefe de Fortune, Alyson Shontell, a hacer una pausa y a […]