Digiday Publishing Summit:
Connect with execs from The New York Times, TIME, Dotdash Meredith and many more
Publishers covet their subscriber information as their crown jewels. That’s a major reason why they’ve viewed Apple’s in-app subscription rules so warily.
On the surface, the rules are a nightmare for publishers since Apple makes it very easy for users to opt out of providing their information. In truth, there are many ways around this for publishers to benefit from the ease of Apple-enabled subs while still collecting the needed customer information.
Apple’s subscription method isn’t crystal clear but we know the basics: all purchases, regardless of subscription or standard, must be offered as in-app purchases with Apple taking a hefty 30 percent cut. Apple doesn’t automatically pass publishers subscriber information. (It claims this is on privacy grounds.) Instead, Apple allows publishers to request personal information entered in iTunes through an in-app prompt on the completion of every subscription. The simplicity of Apple’s “don’t allow/allow” makes it too easy for a user to not provide their information to the publisher, but Apple receives all of it. This is where publishers don’t have to play ball.
By Apple’s rules, publishers can collect data from their end users, with consent,“to provide a service or function that is directly relevant to the use of the application, or to serve advertising.” Apple further states that publishers (those whose applications are content based) with a subscription model in place can collect user information as long as there is a posted and maintained privacy policy in place regarding the use of that information.
Any publisher worth its salt can easily build a page prior to the in-app subscription that would require consumers to provide information. This will get companies the same information they would be able to collect on subscriptions on their websites, although they’ll still have to pay Apple 30 percent of the subscription price.
More in Media

YouTube’s AI slop crackdown has creators concerned, marketers cheering
July 18, 2025
Despite the potential crackdown, both creators and marketers broadly view YouTube’s updated policies as a positive move. They believe it indicates that the platform is paying attention to the ways creators are using AI — and that it’s open to AI tools that don’t result in the propagation of so-called “AI slop” videos.

Jargon buster: The key terms to know on AI bot traffic and monetization
July 18, 2025
Here’s a breakdown of the emerging vocabulary of AI-media economics, what these terms mean, and why they matter now.

Digiday+ Research: Publishers identify the top trends among Gen Z readers
July 17, 2025
Gen Z makes up a very small percentage of publishers’ readership, but those Gen Z audience members are consuming their news anytime, anywhere.