Blockchains are capable of a lot.
They’re good for tracking pork chops. They can help put a stop to the spread of conflict diamonds. With blockchains, doctors can better track patient data, freeing them up to actually see their patients instead of fiddling with all that paperwork. Refugees who don’t have access to basic health and financial services because they don’t have paper proof of existence may be able to get “official” digital identities, thanks to blockchains.
But financial services doesn’t have any such imperatives forcing it to dedicate millions of dollars in research, talent and venture investments in blockchain technology. For this industry it’s really just advanced database technology. It may help it save money – but it’s not a revolution.
“Really [blockchain companies are] building a feature, and I think this is what people have got to understand,” said Jamie Burke, CEO of Outlier Ventures, a research group for blockchain use cases. “The best outcome is it’s bought by an incumbent and it’s just going to become a feature of that incumbent, and that’s fine. I don’t think you’re going to be building the next SAP – as much as everyone thinks that’s going to happen i just don’t see that happening.”
More in Marketing
Nike versus Adidas: Which brand won the World Cup?
We sift through data from AdClarity, Meltwater, Sprout Social and MediaRadar to work out which brand had the best World Cup performance.
Ad Tech Briefing: Apple’s continued interest in ads
A subtle policy update shines a light on how Apple differs from Google.
Five things the World Cup taught marketers about creators
The World Cup has wrapped, which means it’s time for the obligatory marketing takeaways piece.