As competition begins to heat up among companies distributing skinny bundles over the web, Fox- and Sky-backed FuboTV aims to differentiate by sticking to sports.
Launched in 2015 as a distributor of TV channels that show live soccer, FuboTV has expanded to include other sports through carriage deals with national and regional sports networks as well as other cable networks that sometimes carry live sports. Today, up to 37 of the 65-plus channels in FuboTV’s main, $40-per-month bundle carry sports. These channels include Fox Sports’ FS1 and FS2, as well as many of Fox’s regional sports network affiliates; FuboTV has a similar arrangement with Comcast/NBCUniversal for NBCSN and Comcast/NBC Sports affiliates. (Two notable sports holdouts so far are ESPN and Turner.)
FuboTV claims to carry more soccer than any other streaming service, with over 100,000 paying subscribers. For the next 100,000 and beyond, growth is going to come in the form of sports fans of the NBA, college football, the NHL, MLB and other top sports in the U.S., said Alberto Horihuela, co-founder and CMO of FuboTV.
“We still have a strong offer for the soccer community, but there is no mystery in the marketplace that the NFL and college football are massive drivers of consumption in digital,” Horihuela said. “And with the hockey season and the NBA getting underway, it’s going to have a massive impact on our business.”
The landscape of streaming TV bundles — skinny or not — is getting more cluttered every day. In the past year, Hulu and YouTube have launched live TV services, with YouTube recently making a huge marketing push through a sponsorship of the World Series.
YouTube has not disclosed how many people pay for YouTube TV. Hulu’s live TV product, which will soon get its own marketing push, reportedly has 300,000 subscribers. DirecTV Now, which is close to a year old, was nearing 500,000 subscribers at the end of the second quarter, said DirecTV’s parent company AT&T over the summer. Meanwhile, Dish Network’s Sling TV, the oldest service in this group, has more than 2 million subscribers, according to a recent comScore report.
And it’s about to get noisier as Amazon and Verizon work on building streaming channel bundles of their own.
FuboTV’s dedication to offering the “most sports for the least money” — as the company says in some of its marketing materials — might help differentiate it. FuboTV subscribers spend a lot of time watching sports on the service: An average of 80 percent of viewing on FuboTV is live, peaking above 90 percent on days with multiple sporting events, the company said.
“I do think there’s a market for a live TV service like that,” said Alan Wolk, TV industry analyst for TVRev. “Nielsen recently stated that about 90 percent of [subscription video on demand] content is watched on a TV set, which mostly reaffirms the ‘best available screen’ theory — people just want to watch on the best screen possible, and sports looks better on a larger screen.”
Of course, there’s a price to doing business with TV networks, which for the most part are averse to selling their cable channels individually. This means FuboTV and other distributors have to cut multichannel carriage deals that include both sports and non-sports channels.
FuboTV is not concerned about bringing non-sports channels into its bundle, seeing them as complementary to the core sports offering, Horihuela said.
A spokesperson for FuboTV declined to comment on whether the service is profitable yet. But FuboTV has a bit of a runway to compete: The company has raised $75.6 million to date, including a $55 million Series C round in June that included money from media giants such as 21st Century Fox, Sky, Scripps Networks Interactive and Univision.
“Just think about the scale of sports fans here in the U.S. alone,” Horihuela said. “We are still in the process of expanding the bundle from soccer to a multisport [service].”
Future of TV Briefing: Where YouTube Shorts stands among advertisers on eve of creator monetization program’s launch
This week’s Future of TV Briefing looks at the state of advertisers' adoption of YouTube Shorts as the platform prepares to share ad revenue with Shorts creators.
Why TheSoul Publishing’s Victor Potrel isn’t overthinking how YouTube Shorts will share ad revenue with creators and publishers
Potrel weighed in on the methodology behind the YouTube Shorts monetization program in the latest Digiday Podcast episode.
Future of TV Briefing: Streaming ad sellers need supplementary inventory sources
This week's Future of TV Briefing looks at the supply-and-demand dynamics in the streaming ad market.
SponsoredQ&A: How Jounce Media and Teads are framing SPO’s role in driving sustainability
As supply chain concerns abound, marketers are increasingly focusing on the main motivators that drive efficiency in their operations, including financial considerations, supply chain transparency and, most recently, environmental concerns. Sustainability has not always been at the forefront of the digital video buying process for the ad industry, but brands like Teads are taking steps […]
Why entertainment expert Eunice Shin is watching streamers’ subscriber churn rates
Having consulted for companies including Disney, Warner Bros. and NBCUniversal, Shin knows the ins and out of the today’s entertainment business.
How YouTube is calculating creators’ ad-revenue shares for Shorts
Calculating how YouTube Shorts ad revenue will be split is more like doing taxes than basic arithmetic, as this video explainer breaks down.