Eight seats remain

Secure your place at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, March 23-25

REGISTER

From rented audiences to engaged communities: Why participation is the new moat for publishers

Mark Zohar, President and CEO, Viafoura

For more than a decade, digital publishers have had to make a trade-off regarding social media. Social platforms promised reach, scale and frictionless distribution. In exchange, publishers ceded control of audience relationships, data and, ultimately, trust. Today, that bargain is not working.

Social media is imperfect. Feeds are flooded with bots, synthetic engagement, misinformation and bad actors operating under inconsistent or nonexistent moderation standards. Platform incentives reward outrage and velocity over accuracy and context. For publishers — a group that relies on credibility — this environment doesn’t just feel misaligned. It actively undermines the trust on which journalism depends.

At the same time, publishers face a second destabilizing force: platform vulnerability. AI-driven search, zero-click results and what many now call “Google Zero” are accelerating the collapse of referral traffic. Audiences increasingly consume summaries at the top of search results without ever visiting publisher sites. Distribution is shrinking. Attribution is fading. And the once-reliable top of the funnel is disappearing.

In this reality, scale is fragile. Traffic is rented. Content alone is no longer defensible.

The limits of content and subscriptions

Many publishers have responded by doubling down on what they know best: better journalism, smarter paywalls and more sophisticated subscription strategies. These are necessary, but no longer sufficient.

Most publisher websites and apps are still designed around a one-way transaction: Produce content, attract traffic, monetize impressions or subscriptions. Even when engagement tools exist, they are often bolted on, underinvested or treated as secondary to pageviews.

This consumption-first model made sense when platforms reliably delivered distribution. But this model breaks down in a world where platforms intermediate, summarize, remix or replace publisher content upstream. When discovery happens elsewhere and engagement happens off-site, publishers lose more than traffic. They lose the relationship.

And without a relationship, loyalty erodes. Churn increases. Differentiation disappears.

Participation is the new moat

What platforms can’t easily replicate, scrape or summarize is participation.

Participation turns audiences from passive consumers into active participants. It gives people a reason to return, not just for the next story, but to continue a conversation, follow contributors and engage with others who share their interests.

A participatory social layer built directly into a publisher’s owned and operated properties creates that moat that enables conversation, contribution and connection in an environment governed by clear standards and aligned with editorial values.

Participation builds habits.

Participation builds loyalty.

Participation builds direct relationships.

In an era of Google Zero and declining social reach, those first-party relationships are no longer optional. They are the foundation of sustainability.

Competing in the attention economy

Google Zero is only part of the challenge. Publishers are also competing in an increasingly unforgiving attention economy.

Audience time is fragmented across TikTok, Reddit, messaging apps, newsletters, podcasts and endless notifications. Users don’t consciously choose most of these destinations; they default to them. In practice, every publisher is competing to be among the small handful of apps or sites a user engages with daily.

If a publisher is not in that top tier of daily habits, it risks becoming invisible.

Participation is how publishers compete. Community and social experiences create reasons to show up even when users aren’t actively seeking a specific article. They shift the relationship from episodic consumption to ongoing engagement.

This is where owned channels matter. Newsletters, personalized web and mobile notifications, and email are not just distribution tools. They are habit-forming mechanisms that bring audiences back from off-platform spaces into publisher-owned environments, where engagement, identity and community can deepen.

Participation gives those channels something to point to. Not just “read this,” but “join this,” “respond to this” or “see what others are saying.”

Why this moment is different

Ironically, the imperfection of social media has created an opening for publishers.

As major platforms feel chaotic, hostile or unsafe, trusted media brands, especially longstanding national and local news organizations, hold something increasingly rare: credibility earned over decades of serving their communities.

These brands are uniquely positioned to offer a better kind of social experience on their own properties. Not a global, ad-driven network optimized for dramatic posts, but a purpose-built social layer designed to serve readers.

A place where audiences come daily. Not just to read, but to engage with journalists, exchange perspectives with like-minded readers and subscribers, ask questions, share opinions and feel part of something larger than a comment thread.

This isn’t about building the next Facebook. It’s about building a trusted, curated, contextual social environment that reflects the values of the brand and the expectations of its audience.

Designing for participation

Doing this requires more than adding comments. It requires rethinking the product and user experience.

Audiences shaped by social platforms expect activity feeds that surface conversation and participation, not just headlines. They expect modern formats such as short-form and vertical video, live interactions, prompts and social storytelling that invite response rather than passive consumption.

Publisher experiences must evolve beyond the homepage and the article page. Participation has to be designed into the core experience, creating reasons for users to return daily and build habits around engagement, not just content.

From rented audiences to defensible communities

Reclaiming audiences doesn’t mean abandoning social platforms overnight. Social media can still serve as a top-of-funnel amplifier. But it cannot remain the primary venue for engagement, identity or community.

Publishers must rebalance the equation and use social platforms for reach, then bring audiences home, where they control the rules, the data and the experience.

That requires investing in participatory infrastructure, moderation and product teams that treat engagement as a core capability, not an afterthought.

The future of publishing isn’t just about producing great content or selling subscriptions. It’s about building participation-driven moats: daily habits, direct relationships and communities that can’t be disintermediated.

At a moment when social media is failing its users and attention is the scarcest resource of all, participation is the opportunity and the moat publishers can no longer afford to ignore.

Partner insights from Viafoura

More from Digiday

Layoffs hit LADbible Group’s social video team amid slower user-generated content growth

Social-first publisher LADbible is in the middle of a second round of layoffs to its social video team, having suffered massive drop-off in Facebook video engagement.

Best Buy wants to be the hub for AI-powered hardware like glasses, laptops

The tech retailer is looking for growth, as its revenue was essentially flat this past fiscal year from the year before, at almost $42 billion.

Future of TV Briefing: OpenX adds attention targeting for CTV ads backed by TVision

This week’s Future of TV Briefing looks at a new ad targeting option for CTV advertisers wary of people staring at their phones while an ad airs.