Secure your place at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, March 23-25
The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
Why more brands are rethinking influencer marketing with gamified micro-creator programs
Brands like Urban Outfitters and American Eagle are embracing a new, micro-creator-focused approach to influencer marketing. Why now?
WTF is pay per ‘demonstrated’ value in AI content licensing?
Publishers and tech companies are developing a “pay by demonstrated value” model in AI content licensing that ties compensation to usage.
The case for and against publisher content marketplaces
The debate isn’t whether publishers want marketplaces. It’s whether the economics support them.