for the Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit, May 6-8 in Palm Springs.
The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
How former college athlete and Airbnb host turned Love Island fame into widespread success
Love Island star TJ Palma had a successful career before his fame, now he’s generating even more revenue for his businesses through creator content.
Media Briefing: Publishers rewire sales teams for the outcomes era
Publishers are overhauling traditional ad sales teams in favor of outcome-driven teams focused on performance and client success.
The rise of deepfakes poses a new trust challenge for publishers
As AI deepfakes surge and become harder to detect, publishers are under pressure to fact-check content and safeguard credibility.