for the Digiday Programmatic Marketing Summit, May 6-8 in Palm Springs.
The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
Digiday+ Research: Publishers favor generative AI over predictive AI
Publishers have worked to find the right fit for AI tools, and found that generative AI lends itself better to journalism than predictive AI.
MrBeast is so big, Beast Industries turns down eight-figure brand deals if they aren’t the right fit
Beast Industries CEO Jeff Housenbold tells Digiday how the company is expanding and growing the monolith that is MrBeast.
‘I’m playing the long game’: Journalists are striking out alone and discovering the business is toughest beat of all
News creators have become preferred sources for younger viewers, but how do they grow and sustain their independent endeavors?