The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
Why LinkedIn is spotlighting the average watch time metric to support its video push
The company believes more creators will make the jump to LinkedIn for the opportunity to be in front of marketers, investors and other business decision-makers.
How publishers pull YouTube viewers to shop on their sites, with Architectural Digest’s Amy Astley
The Condé Nast-owned publication has recorded a four-times increase in revenue for its “Open Door” series and is planning a relaunch of its AD Shopping property, Astley said on the Digiday Podcast.
AI Briefing: DeepSeek’s emergence from nowhere shows open-source is eating the world
After recent AI developments, ad tech execs ponder the prospect of Big Tech loosening their stranglehold on the industry.