Join us Sept. 14-16 in Miami to connect with top publishing leaders
The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
The IAB is developing a framework to tackle AI advertising measurement
The IAB is developing a framework to solve a big challenge in advertising: how to measure and assign credit when ads influence AI agents.
For brands, the creator ambassador is becoming a creator executive
The new creator partnership brings them into the C-Suite and seeks input and strategy, like Blenders and Jordan “The Stallion” Howlett.
Media Briefing: Ads for AI agents have a measurement problem
A wave of startups is racing to solve AI ad measurement and attribution as publishers and advertisers experiment with serving ads to agents.