Hear from execs at The New York Times, Thomson Reuters, Trusted Media Brands and many others
The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
The publishers’ guide to being gaslit by tech platforms (the AI edition)
Google’s recent claim that AI Overviews is good for publishers struck a nerve. But platforms often use this playbook. Here’s a guide on how to spot the spin.
Media Briefing: Publishers’ new power player: the AI negotiator
Publishers are increasingly creating and filling the role of the AI negotiator, tasked with working with tech companies and platforms to strike deals and reshape publishers’ businesses.
Inside IAB Tech Lab’s meeting with publishers to confront the AI era
Digiday’s Sara Guaglione and Seb Joseph share their reporting on IAB Tech Lab, meeting with more than 80 publishers on AI issues.