Paul Ross, president of The Economist, joined Digiday editor-in-chief Brian Morrissey for a discussion at Digiday Publishing Summit Japan in February. Some highlights:
For The Economist, the election of Donald Trump has been good for its subscription business. The Economist saw its daily subscription rate go up five times.
“We might not agree with the content coming out of Washington, but it’s a fantastic time to be writing.”
Rossi is a staunch believer in being clear-eyed with it comes to platforms like Facebook. For the Economist, Facebook and Google are a way to drive subscriptions, often through providing samples of their content to a new audience.
“If [platforms] are an extension of your advertising business, then beware because that’s not in my mind a long-term, viable position.”
“These platforms have no moral obligation to support good media. They don’t care.”
Reality check for content studios. Publishers are getting into content studios, but they’re finding that the margins for the agency business are not as good as media.
“What we’re seeing is media businesses are winning business based on the quality of their idea, not on their audience. Ultimately with programmatic and data, you can find audiences wherever they are.”
More in Media
Brands turn to creators to build World Cup buzz amid a logistics nightmare
A US-based World Cup poses unique problems and opportunities for brands; activating creators away from the games may be the solution.
Reuters and Time adopt bot-blocking whitelists to rein in AI crawlers
Reuters and Time adopt a ‘block-all’ AI bot strategy, part of a broader publisher move toward whitelist-only access.
Google’s AI opt-out leaves publishers with a choice they can’t safely use
The CMA has, on paper, given publishers a right to refuse AI in search. But because it’s opt-out, and Google is slow-walking the data needed to judge the impact, that right is barely usable, publishers say.