5Qs: National Public Media’s Bryan Moffett

Bryan Moffet is the vp of digital strategy at National Public Media, a joint-owned subsidiary of NPR, PBS and WGBH in Boston. NPM represents the digital and network radio/TV inventory of NPR and PBS to corporate sponsors, which includes the popular NPR and PBS iPhone and iPad apps. He spoke to DIGIDAY about why NPM chose native over web apps, what’s holding back ad dollars in mobile, and the issues publishers face when building apps. Follow him on Twitter @BryanMoffett
When it comes to mobile, it seems like NPM is everywhere. Is there a lean to one type of platform over another? Apps or mobile web?
Because of our unique position selling sponsorship, we have leaned heavily on iOS to date. Both NPR and PBS have strict guidelines that govern sponsorship – particularly what can be said in a banner or audio credit. We disallow transactional calls to action, price/value information, and qualitative language, and the smaller the banner unit, the more difficult it can be for sponsors to invite user interaction. IOS apps give us a lot of flexibility to integrate the sponsorship into the app itself, rather than just rely on small banners embedded in a page. This helps us find the right balance between impact for sponsors and our non-commercial nature. In the iPad, for example, we sell a session roadblock. The sponsor is integrated into the navigation of the app, and users see one full-page interstitial unit backed by a familiar, short NPR-style audio credit. The unit is a good balance between impact for sponsors (we have seen clickthrough rates north of 10 percent), and low intrusion on users. We’re starting to see tools offer similar approaches on the mobile web, and I suspect this will be the year we move the needle in that area for our clients.
Are brands looking for mobile specific solutions from NPM, or is mobile advertising most often bundled with web or radio?
It’s interesting. Three years ago, the strategy was very much to tap into our existing radio sponsors and extend them onto our digital platforms. In the past year or two, we’ve seen a shift, where digital is starting to lead the conversation and secure new sponsors who eventually expand into our traditional media assets. The iPad and iPhone have driven that shift, for sure. We bundle very frequently across radio, digital and mobile for our sponsors, and have found through research that reaching our users on multiple platforms can significantly improve the impact and benefit of a sponsorship.
What is holding mobile advertising back from taking a bigger piece of a brands advertising budget?
Creative support and tracking. To do something really unique, like Visa did on the NPR iPad app, takes a lot of time, effort and involvement from all parties – publisher, advertiser, agency, creative shop and mobile ad vendor. Even for more simple in-app rich media, there’s a learning curve that’s constantly changing, and there’s a lot of inconsistency over what can be tracked and how it must be tracked. Third-party tracking of in-app rich media ads and the actions within them has been troublesome in these early days.
What are the big issues on the publisher side? 
Probably the complexity. Building iOS apps is like pouring concrete. It’s time-consuming and labor-intensive just to build new features into an app with regularity, and user uptake of those new builds can be inconsistent and slow. The need to bake in custom advertiser SDKs to handle rich media ads puts significant strain on an already difficult process, and you also have the vagaries of infrequent user updates and sporadic Apple iOS updates. We had a two occasions where a last-minute, undocumented feature in an iOS upgrade from Apple broke our sponsorship experience. There’s no fast way to deal with that. Building a fix in an app update takes days, and then it can be days or even weeks before Apple approves and releases the update, and even longer before users actually download it. That’s a long time for a bad experience to linger. It’s got to be simplified.
What are your thoughts on mobile ad networks? iAds? Is the Greystripe acquisition a good thing for the space?
Neither NPR nor PBS use ad networks – everything we do is direct-sold — so I can’t comment with any authority on that space. I do think iAd has been great for the industry, though, in that it focused the advertising world on compelling rich media executions in apps. We’d been using the Medialets platform to do exactly that for more than a year before iAd came out, so it was great to see that approach validated. I think we’ll see a lot of shakeups in the space over the next year, but in the end I’d like to see simple, uniform approaches that allow primary display ad servers to handle the serving logic with simple ad calls in apps or mobile, and let publishers and agencies choose from a variety of rich media platforms that can be used to build and serve compelling creative.
https://digiday.com/?p=5985
Digiday Top Stories
  • Coalition for Better Ads experiences European growing pains

    The Coalition for Better Ads is putting more people on the ground in Europe to combat communication and resource issues.

  • The state of UK mobile ad spend in 5 charts

    People are spending more time on mobile, so advertisers are following. In the first half of 2016, the U.K. saw mobile ad spend rocket to £1.7 billion ($2.1 billion), more than double the same total for 2015. According to the stats, search and video formats are behind the boom. But while desktop is on the way out, TV has a firmer grip on advertiser purse strings.

  • China’s Cheetah Mobile eyes U.S. for growth

    App developer Cheetah Mobile is a global company with Chinese roots. It is focused on the global market because Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu are winning the speed-scale battle in China and copycat startups pop up overnight. The company started shifting its focus to the global mobile market with a focus on utility apps four years ago, and this year, it’s transitioning from utility to content apps.

  • Opinion: Ad blocking + telecoms = a match made at the bank

    The battle for free, high-quality Internet content just got heated. Mobile operator Three has declared itself the second wireless service provider to integrate ad blocking at a network level, courtesy of ad blocking company Shine. It's being waged under the banner of “a better consumer experience,” on mobile devices, but I believe the debate is less about the consumer and much more about the money. Specifically, who’s going to make more of it.

  • Why Telefónica is getting brands to pay for its customers’ data plans

    Spanish telecom giant Telefónica is betting on sponsored-data ad models as a key future revenue stream. The company, which is in the process of selling U.K. operator O2 to Hutchison Whaompa for £10.2 billion, has been testing several variations of sponsored-data packages for the last year and is now poised for a more widespread rollout, and it wants more advertiser partners. Telefónica's global ad director Dan Rosen spoke to Digiday about the benefits.