There’s a popular notion around that “information wants to be free.” It’s the idea that on the Internet, the economics of information have irrevocably changed. Progressives will get with the program and stop charging for access to content, the revolutionaries claim. It’s interesting that these revolutionaries typically charge fat fees themselves for their consulting services. That type of information, it seems, does not want to be free. Union Square Ventures partner Andy Weissman believes the “information wants to be free” slogan misses the real change in digital media. It’s not that information itself wants to be free, it’s that the spread of information can’t be constricted. This is a critical difference — and highlights that, recent fights over SOPA notwithstanding, the tech and media worlds can come together around the power of the network.
This is represented by the idea that there are no more consumers now, there are only “users.” As a result, this transformation alters fundamentally the whole media value chain. This is potentially disruptive to many companies. But it does not mean that users will not pay for information or content. To the contrary. For example, Hollywood’s best box office years ever were 2009 and 2010. Similarly, publishing industry revenues expanded in 2010 almost 6 percent over 2008 (with ebook sales growth of over 1000 percent). Hulu has over 1.5 million paying subscribers. Therefore, it’s not helpful if the discussion centers around whether information wants to be free or not. For that is not the right equation. Information (content) does not want to be free. Instead, information just wants to be distributed friction-free. That’s a big difference, and also the massive opportunity that should be at the center right now.
See Weissman’s full post at his blog, aweissman.com. Follow him on Twitter at @aweissman.
More in Media
The Rundown: Google has drawn its AI payment lines — and publishers’ leverage is narrow
For publishers trying to navigate AI licensing, the message was blunt: Google is willing to pay for access, but not for training – and it remains unwilling to define AI Overviews as a compensable use of journalism.
Media Briefing: Google’s latest core update a reminder that pageviews can’t remain the primary metric
Google’s latest core update signals pageviews can no longer be the primary metric, favoring intent-solving publishers over scale.
After an oversaturation of AI-generated content, creators’ authenticity and ‘messiness’ are in high demand
Content creators and brand marketing specialists on how 2026 will be the year creator authenticity becomes even more crucial in the face of rampant AI-generated “slop” flooding social media platforms.