There’s a popular notion around that “information wants to be free.” It’s the idea that on the Internet, the economics of information have irrevocably changed. Progressives will get with the program and stop charging for access to content, the revolutionaries claim. It’s interesting that these revolutionaries typically charge fat fees themselves for their consulting services. That type of information, it seems, does not want to be free. Union Square Ventures partner Andy Weissman believes the “information wants to be free” slogan misses the real change in digital media. It’s not that information itself wants to be free, it’s that the spread of information can’t be constricted. This is a critical difference — and highlights that, recent fights over SOPA notwithstanding, the tech and media worlds can come together around the power of the network.
This is represented by the idea that there are no more consumers now, there are only “users.” As a result, this transformation alters fundamentally the whole media value chain. This is potentially disruptive to many companies. But it does not mean that users will not pay for information or content. To the contrary. For example, Hollywood’s best box office years ever were 2009 and 2010. Similarly, publishing industry revenues expanded in 2010 almost 6 percent over 2008 (with ebook sales growth of over 1000 percent). Hulu has over 1.5 million paying subscribers. Therefore, it’s not helpful if the discussion centers around whether information wants to be free or not. For that is not the right equation. Information (content) does not want to be free. Instead, information just wants to be distributed friction-free. That’s a big difference, and also the massive opportunity that should be at the center right now.
See Weissman’s full post at his blog, aweissman.com. Follow him on Twitter at @aweissman.
More in Media
Bleacher Report puts a fan-first spin on NFL coverage
Bleacher Report has 25 different show formats that will roll out throughout the NFL season and is forecasting a 50% revenue hike.
WTF is Model Context Protocol (MCP) and why should publishers care?
Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a buzzword gaining more traction, especially as publishers think about how to prepare for the agentic web. WTF is it, and why should they care?
Publishers and advertisers face new AI agent oversight hurdles
Who is really in control when agents are instructing other agents, and who is accountable if they make mistakes? That question is keeping some media and ad execs up at night.