Digiday Publishing Summit:
Connect with execs from The New York Times, TIME, Dotdash Meredith and many more
Social media is a challenge to agencies and clients because it’s so many things to so many people. Many creative agencies see it as an opportunity to have people pass along high-quality brand advertising. Think Nike’s “Write the Future” video. Digital shops lean on the sites they build, calling it owned media or platforms that customers seek out and give them tangible benefits to a product. Media agencies can see it as a new opportunity to place social ads on Facebook and Twitter. Public relations shops tend to emphasize the customer service aspect to social and “influencer” programs that result in earned media.
Now, social media is of course all these things. That doesn’t stop agency types from fighting each other over it. After all, there are budgets at stake. Witness the weekend dust-up between The Barbarian Group COO Rick Webb and Edelman svp of digital David Armano. Both are probably closer in agreement than they think, but Webb set off Armano with a post that made the argument that social media agencies can’t “polish a turd.” The point: If a creative sucks, all the outreach in the world and priming the pump of influencers won’t do much. Webb cites TBG’s recent experiment with GroupMeh, a faux social network for the apathetic.
It reinforces our strong belief that success in social media begins with great creative, strong execution, with a smart earned, distribution plan, optimized on-the-fly. Without that integration, you have creative being made in a vacuum, divorced from the distribution. You have firms that do PR that have no real say in the idea, handed something and told to “make it famous.” This fact contributes greatly to the rivers of junk floating around the internet, clogging up inboxes and generally being lame.
Those are fighting words for Armano, who works for a large public relations firm and often derides web shops for their addiction to “flashburbation.” Armano called Webb’s post “shallow” and sought to put a framework (with nifty graphic) around how he views social media’s many flavors.
[T]he businesses which succeed in the long run (and the CEO’s driving them), understand that it’s the coordination of a good product and service, combined with an integration of ecosystems, support and marketing initiatives which will result in long term value for not ony customers but all stakeholders. My advice to business and agency alike? Take a pass on spinning the wheel of marketing misfortune and work on integrating these efforts today.
The debate continued on Twitter where the particulars got messy as each side chose its own examples and analogies most beneficial. If anything, the lesson that arises is social media remains a difficult nut to crack for clients. This so-called “flyball effect” leaves a vacuum that ends up attracting competition from all corners of marketing services, all of which are prone to emphasize their own specialty.
More in Media

YouTube’s AI slop crackdown has creators concerned, marketers cheering
July 18, 2025
Despite the potential crackdown, both creators and marketers broadly view YouTube’s updated policies as a positive move. They believe it indicates that the platform is paying attention to the ways creators are using AI — and that it’s open to AI tools that don’t result in the propagation of so-called “AI slop” videos.

Jargon buster: The key terms to know on AI bot traffic and monetization
July 18, 2025
Here’s a breakdown of the emerging vocabulary of AI-media economics, what these terms mean, and why they matter now.

Digiday+ Research: Publishers identify the top trends among Gen Z readers
July 17, 2025
Gen Z makes up a very small percentage of publishers’ readership, but those Gen Z audience members are consuming their news anytime, anywhere.