Secure your place at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, March 23-25
In a somewhat surprising turn of events, there actually may be a bidding war for decidedly Internet 1.0 brand About.com. According to Reuters, Barry Diller has put in a $300 million bid for About, the New York Times underperforming SEO-bait information site. Why?
Though not much may happen because Answers.com and its private equity backers have already signed a letter of intent to grab About, we know Diller’s no fool. The economics are clearly in his favor: NYT wants to shed this dead weight and IAC thinks it can snag it up for cheap. About hasn’t been able to drive revenues or traffic and IAC saw revenue from Ask.com and its other sites jump 46 percent to $348.8 million last quarter.
And with a billion dollar war chest Diller, IAC can afford to take this lowly investment and make it work. Diller also has a strong track record in this space with his other sites in the information space: Ask.com, Dictionary.com, Reference.com.
Marrying the vast amounts of content produced by About with the sensibilities of Ask’s new Q&A format (as well as with other IAC properties) IAC might see an opportunity to lure advertisers to a search-powered Q&A site. Q&A sites could be a new frontier for advertisers as intent and relevancy signals can be high.
Or at the very least, use About content as fact-checkers for Newsweek.
Photo via Fotopedia
More in Media
Urban Outfitters shifts its influencer strategy from reach to participation
Me@UO is Urban Outfitters’ new creator program leverage micro-creators with smaller, engaged communities that are passionate about the brand.
Media Briefing: Without transparency, publishers can’t tell if Google’s Preferred Sources feature benefits them
Six months in, Google’s Preferred Sources promises loyalty-driven visibility, but leaves publishers guessing at the traffic impact.
In Graphic Detail: Publishers chase video podcast growth, but audio still leads
Podcasting may be racing into video, but more listeners still prefer audio — leaving publishers caught between hype and habit.