There’s a struggle going on in Hollywood right now between old and new media. Variety, the 107-year-old trade magazine, is not only having trouble finding a suitor, but has also come to the conclusion that its $40 million price tag may be too much.
The problem, like many traditional publishers trying to keep its heads above water, is that there are now many online-only trade publications, like Nikki Finke’s Deadline Hollywood, HollywoodLife.com and to a certain extent TMZ, who offer the same (and sometimes more exclusive) content that doesn’t reside behind a paywall. It’s the same story that’s playing out across industries. It’s hard to imagine that if you were to reinvent Variety today that you’d start with a print product.
Digital properties are more nimble than a weekly and trade publications are not immune to the changes in the media landscape. If Reed Elsevier wants to sell Variety, it needs to prove why a legacy media company can work in a digital world. And as the Post points out, dropping the price may be the only way out.
More in Media
Why LinkedIn is spotlighting the average watch time metric to support its video push
The company believes more creators will make the jump to LinkedIn for the opportunity to be in front of marketers, investors and other business decision-makers.
How publishers pull YouTube viewers to shop on their sites, with Architectural Digest’s Amy Astley
The Condé Nast-owned publication has recorded a four-times increase in revenue for its “Open Door” series and is planning a relaunch of its AD Shopping property, Astley said on the Digiday Podcast.
AI Briefing: DeepSeek’s emergence from nowhere shows open-source is eating the world
After recent AI developments, ad tech execs ponder the prospect of Big Tech loosening their stranglehold on the industry.