Secure your place at the Digiday Publishing Summit in Vail, March 23-25
There’s a struggle going on in Hollywood right now between old and new media. Variety, the 107-year-old trade magazine, is not only having trouble finding a suitor, but has also come to the conclusion that its $40 million price tag may be too much.
The problem, like many traditional publishers trying to keep its heads above water, is that there are now many online-only trade publications, like Nikki Finke’s Deadline Hollywood, HollywoodLife.com and to a certain extent TMZ, who offer the same (and sometimes more exclusive) content that doesn’t reside behind a paywall. It’s the same story that’s playing out across industries. It’s hard to imagine that if you were to reinvent Variety today that you’d start with a print product.
Digital properties are more nimble than a weekly and trade publications are not immune to the changes in the media landscape. If Reed Elsevier wants to sell Variety, it needs to prove why a legacy media company can work in a digital world. And as the Post points out, dropping the price may be the only way out.
More in Media
The case for and against publisher content marketplaces
The debate isn’t whether publishers want marketplaces. It’s whether the economics support them.
Urban Outfitters shifts its influencer strategy from reach to participation
Me@UO is Urban Outfitters’ new creator program leverage micro-creators with smaller, engaged communities that are passionate about the brand.
Media Briefing: Without transparency, publishers can’t tell if Google’s Preferred Sources feature benefits them
Six months in, Google’s Preferred Sources promises loyalty-driven visibility, but leaves publishers guessing at the traffic impact.