What a landmark AI hiring bias lawsuit means for employers and candidates
This story was first published by Digiday sibling WorkLife
What companies can and cannot do as far as using AI tools in their hiring processes is becoming more clear following a landmark case settled in New York earlier this month.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit against a China-based online tutoring company for allegedly using an AI tool that automatically filtered through and rejected about 200 female applicants over the age of 55, and males over 60.
One applicant discovered the error when she was quickly rejected but decided to submit her same resume with a different birthdate — which got her an interview — according to the suit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
The company agreed to pay $365,000 this month though admitted to no wrongdoing, and will create new anti-discrimination policies, reconsider all those wrongfully rejected applicants and divvy up the settlement amount between them.
“This is as obvious as a human interviewing candidates and rejecting older applicants over younger ones,” Natalie Pierce, partner at Gunderson Dettmer and chair of the firm’s employment and labor practice, said. “But AI, not a human being, did the screening,” she added.
To read the full story click here
More in Media
Immediate deepens CMP strategy, slashes ad tech partnerships for sharper data governance
Consent management platforms at Immediate aren’t just about ticking boxes for data laws.
Teads’ M&A rumors are firming up with a deal to merge with Outbrain
The latest installment of ad tech M&A activity is leaving some industry folks surprised.
Media Briefing: Publishers say private programmatic revenue is up – but open is a mixed bag
Publishers check in on their programmatic businesses.