‘Tis Better to Receive than to Give on Facebook
It looks like Facebook users are a little selfish. According to research from Pew Internet, people prefer to get rather than give on Facebook.
Using data from a total of 269 survey respondents who gave permission for Facebook to provide data on their usage along with data from telephone interviews conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International from Oct. 20 to Nov. 28, 2010, from a sample of 2,255 adults, age 18 and older, Pew’s study on “Why most Facebook users get more than they give” reports that Facebook users are more often the receivers of actions like friend requests, likes and comments than they are the givers.
Pew Internet found that over a one-month period, 40 percent of Facebook users in the sample set made a friend request, while 63 percent received at least one request. Users pressed the like button next to friends’ content an average of 14 times, but had their content “liked” an average of 20 times. Continuing this trend, users sent nine personal messages, but received 12. Twelve percent of users tagged a friend in a photo, but 35 percent were tagged by others in a photo.
The explanation for this trend of getting more than we give on Facebook is the existence of so-called “power users.” The study reports that a proportion of its Facebook participants – ranging between 20% and 30% of users (depending on the type of activity) were power users who performed certain Facebook activities at a much higher rate than the average user. It is because of these power users’ over-activity that the average Facebook user receives friend requests, likes and Facebook messages, is tagged in photos at a higher frequency than they contribute.
Interestingly, the study found that power users tend to specialize in at least one area of Facebook activity: 43 percent of those in the sample set were power users in at least one Facebook activity out of sending friend requests, pressing the like button, sending private messages or tagging friends in photos.
Data from Pew Internet:
See the full study here.
Why some publishers are giving their AI chatbots a personality
BuzzFeed and Ingenio are hoping giving their chatbots a unique voice and tone will differentiate their AI products but others are prioritizing utility over entertainment.
Publishers say the competition is steeper than expected for event sponsorship dollars this year
Selling events was harder than expected for some publishers in Q2, but having a niche helped win some of the coveted sponsorship dollars.
Digiday+ Research: Nearly two-thirds of publishers think they will lose when the third-party cookie dies
Publishers have been busy prepping for the end of the third-party cookie, but that doesn't mean they think they'll come out on top in the post-cookie era. In fact, publishers count themselves among those who stand to lose from the end of the cookie.
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
Media Briefing: Publisher execs fear lack of visibility for Q3, but feel steady year over year
Publisher execs share how Q2 shook out for their businesses as they brace for an equally murky second half.
As AI spreads across the marketing landscape, data’s role will be key to success or danger
There’s a growing awareness of the risks inherent in AI's ultra-powerful potential, but whether enough steps are being taken to mitigate them remains a huge question mark.