Alan Wolk is a consultant with BRaVe Ventures and author of “Over The Top. How The Internet Is (Slowly But Surely) Changing The Television Industry.”
If you’re like most streaming video providers, your data is something you don’t really like talking about. It’s not very robust, there’s no real rhyme or reason to it, and while you know you should be doing more with it, you’re not really sure how.
That could be deadly. The data contained in your underlying catalog can help you build and retain audiences, make better programming decisions and create more effective advertising campaigns.
With thousands of titles and dozens of providers to choose from, viewers need to be aware of the types of content you have available — at best, they will know one or two shows, which is likely not representative of your full catalog.
Netflix has set a very high bar on data use. It has been able to gain a clear lead over the rest of the industry by investing sizable sums into creating and tracking data — by some estimates, as much as $150 million a year.
More important, it has put this data to good use. Netflix utilizes its data for marketing purposes in order to increase its audience, currently estimated at over 50 million subscribers in the U.S. alone. It can target consumers with titles by interest, and it can then use its data to find similar titles as well. Consumers who like “Raiders of the Lost Ark” may also like “Out of Africa,” and by showing them both titles in a targeted ad, Netflix vastly improves its chances of gaining (and retaining) a customer.
Investing in original content is an expensive undertaking, though. Netflix uses its extensive data to eliminate some of the risk. By focusing on the types of shows that its users are likely to respond to, Netflix has been able to make more informed decisions about the types of shows it should invest in. That was the case with “House of Cards,” which became Netflix’s first foray into original programming once it had determined that political dramas would be an excellent fit.
The final area where Netflix makes use of its data is in site personalization. By looking at what shows you’ve watched, it is able to suggest similar shows and movies you might like, creating a unique and personal experience for every user. This has proven to be a very appealing feature, as it generally turns up shows the viewer was familiar with but may not have known were available on Netflix, increasing their appreciation of the breadth and depth of Netflix’s content.
Anyone launching a new so-called over-the-top or streaming site must be prepared to live up to Netflix’s standard, as consumers will now expect that level of personalization.
Since most entrants can’t afford to sink $150 million a year into data, their solution will need to come from third-party vendors like Jinni, which originally specialized in building recommendation engines. By pairing “taste partners,” users who like the same movies, Jinni is able to give new OTT sites the ability to offer greater personalization.
It is also able to use its own databases to help fill in the gaps in its partners’ databases, which then allows providers to begin pushing titles from deep within their catalogs directly to the people who are most likely to be interested in them. Providers also have the ability to surface suggested content as part of an advertising campaign, which serves as a way to informing customers — both current and potential — how much programming is available.
“With personalization, you put the user in the center and ask which titles are a good match for them,” notes Jinni CEO Yosi Glick. “With targeted advertising, you put the title in the center and ask which is the right audience. One challenge is the mirror image of the other.”
As personalization becomes the watchword for streaming video, data becomes more important. While many new entrants are tempted to throw all their money into content acquisition, that strategy will fail if it isn’t supported by a rich data play: The more providers know about their underlying databases, the more use they can make out of the content they have, the more cost-effective that content becomes.
Bloomberg, Axios, Politico, other business publishers rethink subscriber retention during the economic downturn
Premium publishers, like POLITICO, Axios and Bloomberg, have to make sure their fees are still considered a necessity as readers recalculate their spending and companies recalculate their expense budgets.
Why Vice, BBC, WaPo, others see new TikTok teams as the next wave of specialist publishing talent
As news publishers craft their TikTok strategies, Digiday spoke with the BBC, Vice, The Washington Post and LADbible to see who’s really behind the posts.
Digiday+ Research deep dive: Publishers anticipate a big drop in ad revenue this year
Digiday's survey found that publishers are not feeling great about advertising revenue as 2023 kicks off, with attitudes toward subscriptions and e-commerce shifting as well.
SponsoredHow publishers are fighting clickbait ads and protecting audiences
Sponsored by GeoEdge For publishers, delivering an engaging user experience is paramount to ensuring loyalty and safeguarding monetization opportunities. One major revenue channel for publishers is selling programmatic ads, but it’s becoming increasingly difficult to control the quality of the ads that come through programmatic channels. As a result, clickbait, offensive and misleading ads are […]
Media Briefing: Subscriber churn is up, but the economic downturn isn’t necessarily to blame
Even though subscription growth is declining year over year and churn rates are on the rise, this is likely more a story of returning to normalization than one of the economic downturn damaging yet another publisher business.
Confessions of a media executive: ‘As an Apple user, I love what they’re doing’
Apple is often charged with 'predatory privacy' but some media execs quietly acknowledge the upside.