The Trump bump: Slate’s paying membership jumps 46 percent after the election
Trump is turning out to be good business for Slate.
Along with other news organizations, the culture and politics site has had a big boost in subscribers in the wake of the election of Donald Trump. Since Election Day, its Slate Plus premium membership service has shot up 46 percent to 26,700 members.
Gabe Roth, head of Slate Plus, said that membership in the 2-year-old program had shown “steady, unspectacular growth” until the election. Slate had already discounted the annual price a couple months earlier, to $35 from $50, and with Trump’s victory, started more explicitly pitching the program as a call to arms to help Slate keep him accountable.
At those rates, Slate Plus annual revenue could approach $1.3 million, enough for Slate to think about adding a fourth dedicated staffer to the program.
“People are suddenly alarmed at the incoming administration,” Roth said. “People are newly aware of the importance of having independent sources of media that are unafraid to say directly what’s going on. And they respect what Slate’s political team has done and want to make sure we can keep doing it.”
One of the questions publishers have to figure out with a paywall is how much content to put behind the wall. With Slate Plus, Slate opted to keep its site free while giving members perks like ad-free podcasts, members-only stories and discounts to live events. What’s happened is that Slate has realized that part of the value of its content is being able to share it with others. (Journalists also have been known to chafe at paywalls because it means their articles will reach a limited audience, although Roth said that wasn’t an issue for Slate’s writers.)
So Slate Plus plans to regularly use some of its newfound revenue to fund political and investigative journalism that will be freely available on the site but marked as being made possible by Slate Plus. Starting in the next week or so, there will be a regular weekly feature, big investigations and a weekly roundup newsletter, This Week in Trump, produced this way.
Creating more free content helps Slate’s ad-supported site, which it’s still committed to growing. As for whether making more of its journalism available for free will discourage people from subscribing, Julia Turner, Slate’s editor-in-chief, said the same benefits would still be available to Slate Plus members only. “We want the stories to have as broad an audience as possible,” she said.
Slate’s experience is instructive as publishers are searching for new paywall models with ad revenue becoming harder to come by. While a handful of media organizations have managed to succeed in getting people to pay for online news, they’re in the minority.
Slate has an advantage over commodity news sites in that it has a core of loyal readers, which it’s been cultivating by trying to drive more direct traffic to the site. Roth said the retention rate has been strong, and some “non-trivial number” opt to contribute above and beyond the annual fee, although, of course, there’s no guarantee the growth will continue at the rate it has, especially since Slate plans to end the discounted rate soon. Roth expressed confidence that the increase isn’t temporary, though.
“It’s tremendously encouraging to all the people here to feel like people are responding and finding value to it to the point where they’re making a contribution,” Roth said.
More in Media
Publishers are still feeling the effects of a change Facebook made in May that caused a steep decline in referral traffic. Nearly four months later, publishers aren’t sure when — or if — that traffic will come back.
A new definition for MFAs is available but the vague nature of the guidelines is leading to a lack of standards that might prevent adoption.
The publishers who attended DPS were focused on the potential upsides of applying the technology to their operations while guarding against the downsides.