The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
AI Briefing: Senators propose new regulations for privacy, transparency and copyright protections
A new bill called the COPIED Act aims to pass new transparency standards to protect IP and guard against AI-generated misinformation.
Media Briefing: Publishers reflect on ad revenue midway through 2024
Some publishers say ad revenue is pacing 15% up year over year while others are still managing their expectations for how 2024 will shake out.
Teads is exploring sale options as M&A in ad tech heats up
Sources state the Altice-owned stalwart of outstream video has recently held talks with private equity and strategic players.