Join us Sept. 24 in NYC to connect with execs from Digitas, Claire's, Marriott, Havas and others
The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
‘It’s hard to be a $7 billion company’: The investment banker’s diagnosis for ad tech’s public woes
Public ad tech is disappearing and an investment banker just explained why.
IAB Creator Upfront: Why a half-built infrastructure is holding back CFO buy-in
IAB’s inaugural Creatorfronts sought to smooth-over some creator economy bumps to help get more CFOs on board.
How Reuters’ dynamic paywall is boosting subscriptions and ads
Reuters’ dynamic paywall is helping the publisher grow subscriptions while strengthening (rather than cannibalizing) its ads business.