Lock in a year of Digiday+ for 35% less.
The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
Brands are getting creative as fuel costs raise shipping fees
UPS now has surge emergency fees for goods coming from India, China and Hong Kong to the United States.
The healthcare creator is finally diagnosing how they best fit into the creator economy
Healthcare creators are powerful brand partners, but they have to fit into the creator economy without sacrificing their credibility.
Media Briefing: As Google traffic ebbs, some publishers see social platforms as real revenue lines
Publishers are once again leaning on social platforms, but with a different playbook to offset declining Google traffic.