The Federal Trade Commission spent a full day yesterday, listening to 22 representatives from publishing, technology and academia to tackle that most thorny of questions: How to label native advertising.
There were arguments on all sides, with one academic even suggesting the need to study how the eye’s fovea perceives various labeling. Publishers hedged, they cautioned against the dreaded “one-size-fits-all” approach since native ads can apparently vary so widely. That’s why there is a BrandVoice on Forbes, Featured Partners on BuzzFeed, “From Around the Web” from Outbrain, “You May Like” from Tablooa, and so on.
Coincidentally, most also paid fealty to paid search listings, hailed as the original native ad format: a form of content, perfectly suited to the environment, and found genuinely useful to consumers who click away to the tune of billions for Google’s coffers. Perhaps then the industry should keep it simple and cast its gaze on how Google has settled on labeling this “native” format:
More in Media
Time has started serving ads to AI bots
Time is selling ads targeting AI bots, betting that markdown pages will make its content (and advertisers) more visible in AI search.
Media Briefing: Threatening to quit Google’s crawlers is just publishers’ new hope
Bold Call: Google’s AI era is fueling fresh calls for publishers to cut off access to their content, but dependence on search still holds most back.
Kai Cenat’s Streamer U was a ‘masterclass’ for brands looking to tap content creators
The creator bootcamp brought in big brand partnerships and big engagement metrics, which could bring more brands to the streaming sponsorship table.