Cross-device display ad campaigns are complicated, and responsive design isn’t making life any easier.
Publishers’ sites might be responsive, but the ad units they sell are fixed dimensions, unable to adapt to the screens of smartphone and tablet devices. This presents a hurdle for marketers, too. Running a cross-device campaign usually means multiple pieces of creative to suit the range of screen sizes the ads might appear on. Serving those different units can be a pain, too. It’s a lot of heavy lifting.
Google told Digiday it’s testing a number of possible solutions to the problem. As publishers begin to adopt responsive design en masse and advertisers target their campaigns to an increasing range of devices, responsive-ad units could have a healthy future ahead of them. It will join other companies, like Undertone and ResponsiveAds, which have already launched products to do exactly that.
“Marketers want simple. It’s time-intensive and costly to build banners of all different shapes and sizes when they want to run a cross-device campaign,” said Eric Franchi, Undertone co-founder. “That’s the problem that needs solving.”
Google’s entry is significant, considering that it is the biggest force by far in online advertising. If there’s a single theme for the industry, it’s a desire to make things simpler. The fact remains that it’s far more costly and difficult to execute campaigns in digital media than it is in other media.
Undertone says a more effective method is to make the ad units themselves responsive, so one piece of creative can simply adapt itself to the device it’s being viewed on. That’s the thinking behind the “Screenshift” product the company launched this week, which will see it producing HTML5-based, responsive creative on behalf of advertisers as well as brokering space for the ads on publishers’ sites. So far, Screenshift ads have been tested with advertisers such as Starbucks and L’Oreal and have appeared on publisher sites including the Washington Times, AdWeek and Emarketer.
Meanwhile, ResponsiveAds is pushing a similar product it calls “Stretch,” which also helps advertisers create responsive banners. Brands including Zippo, Macworld and Angry Birds have tested the firm’s technology, which it claims can significantly reduce creative development time for multiscreen campaigns.
“It makes100 percent sense for Google to go into this space,” said Franchi. “Like us, they just want to make things as simple as possible.”
Publishers will welcome anything that helps their sales forces monetize their inventory more successfully, especially if it means adding efficiencies when it comes to things like trafficking. Mashable says it’s currently building and testing responsive ads, for example, both in-house and using third-party tools and technologies.
The advantages of responsive ads might be more than just increased efficiencies and simpler ad tags. Responsive-ad creative might also help publishers monetize their mobile traffic more successfully than they’re currently managing to, by enabling them to more easily sell cross-platform packages as opposed device-specific media.
The hurdle many media owners face is that advertisers aren’t really that interested in buying mobile banners, so they’re often thrown in by sales teams as a value add to a desktop media purchase. They’re usually viewed and traded as an afterthought as opposed to a major part of an ad buy, and fill-rates are low as a result.
Both Undertone and ResponsiveAds claim that’s a problem they’re addressing. One of the things keeping publishers up at night is the monetization of their growing mobile audiences. Some are turning to sponsored content or “native ads” to help, but perhaps cross-platform, large-canvas creative formats can help, too.
Google’s tools to help publishers better integrate advertising into their responsive sites are expected to launch later this year. Regardless of what they are, the ad giant will likely play a major part in shaping the way many publishers and marketers deal with the issue.
Image via Shutterstock
Publishers speak out on the state of the media business at the Digiday Publishing Summit
With the calendar flipping to spring, do publishers feel like the economic conditions are starting to thaw or do they expect the second quarter to be similarly frigid?
How Forbes and The Daily Beast are consolidating diverse revenue streams to create the highest value audience
Forbes and The Daily Beast have shed the silo-model when it comes to how their revenue teams operate.
Media Briefing: Publishers share their biggest challenges and opportunities at the Digiday Publishing Summit
While Q1 ad revenue, sales cycles and payment windows appeared to be equally bad across the media industry, bright spots arose around consumer revenue streams, new tech experimentation and traffic patterns.
SponsoredHow critical data pillars will increase brands’ confidence in CTV
Mario Diez, CEO, Peer39 With every quarter, the balance of TV viewership slips away from the traditional linear model and more towards connected TV. Less than half of the adults in the U.S. subscribe to cable or satellite, and fewer than half of the households watched linear TV daily in the second half of 2022. […]
The AMERICA Act spotlights Capitol Hill’s ingrained antipathy for Big Tech
A reprised version of the Competition and Transparency in Digital Advertising Act spells trouble for double-sided marketplaces.
How BuzzFeed’s Creator Score is grading the impact of its creator network
BuzzFeed's Creator Network is a primary focus in 2023 for the publisher, and its campaign grading tool is being used to prove out its ability to create successful ads.