Why publishers want attention to replace the impression
Publishers have long lamented being held to ad success standards that don’t correlate to quality. Whether it’s clicks or impressions, publishers are often put in the position of having business incentives that don’t match up with serving their audiences.
Now, more publishers are trying to opt out of the pageview rat race. Instead, they’re pushing the idea that what their advertisers really want is not pageviews but attention. The Financial Times will next month begin selling time by the hour for any ad which is viewed for five seconds or more. And now The Economist Group is rolling out a new set of “dynamic attention metrics” to help advertisers buy time rather than impressions for their ads.
“There is a wonderful world of performance marketing and direct response where you see an ad for a holiday, click on it and someone gets paid. But publishers are recognizing that’s not necessarily the goal for a brand advertiser,” said Tony Haile, CEO of Chartbeat. “If I’m Miller Lite, I don’t expect anyone to click on my ad and buy a six pack of beer. That’s not why I’m putting my ad there.”
The Economist’s ViewGuarantee will promise that at least 75 percent of ads served on Economist.com across a campaign will meet IAB viewability standards. This is higher than most typical publishers achieve for their ads according to Moat analytics, a supplier for ViewGuarantee, whose Q2 2014 reports show publishers averaged 47.6 percent on desktop and 44.2 percent on mobile. The Economist’s other new product, TimeGuarantee, promises advertisers over 250 hours viewing time for their ads on the company’s digital editions such as The Economist’s iPad app.
It’s one thing to say your campaign served the right amount of impressions, but the seed of doubt has been sewn as to whether this has had the right impact for the advertiser — be that time spent viewing it, poor positioning on the page, or indeed bot traffic. These moves toward selling attention minutes instead of impressions are part of the response to this crisis in advertiser confidence.
To be sure, a new focus on attention over pageviews will not cure all that ills the digital media system. There will still be a supply and demand imbalance between advertisers and publishers. But attention, in theory, is finite, whereas pageviews are infinite. Consider, for instance, the pageview-based system would dictate, from a business perspective, that a long article be broken into four separate pages, automatically quadrupling ad impressions. The rise of clickbait — loosely defined as tricking users into clicking a headline — can be tracked back to an ad system that rewards generating ad impressions, however fleeting.
The challenge of any new approach, no matter how sensible, is the refrain “but that’s not how we operate.” There are boxes on ad buyer spreadsheets for impressions and clicks, not for “attention.”
“It’s an interesting trend. Generally, I’m very supportive of any publisher that is improving the quality of their layout,” said Damien Healy, vp of technology and operations for WPP Group’s ad buying network Xaxis. “Though I am a little bit worried about introducing new metrics and new ways of delivering advertising because it has the potential to make things more complicated.”
Undoubtedly true, yet it’s equally true that many see the online ad system teetering on the edge of chaos. There are 5 trillion ad impressions expected by comScore in the U.S. market alone. That glut, if it continues to rise, will lead to further erosion of ad prices — and conceivably threaten the ability to create quality content. This kind of vicious circle would benefit nobody: publishers, advertisers or agencies. A clear way out is to reorient the advertising system to find a way to reward publishers that are able to generate quality content that attracts quality audiences.
Jonah Goodhart, CEO and co-founder of Moat analytics, emphasized the importance of this trend. “The trend for marketers and publishers to begin transacting on attention metrics is a key shift in the industry and signals the importance of changing how we evaluate advertising success in digital.”
‘Not the future’: European publishers remain steadfast in blocking alternative IDs to third-party cookies
Some European publishers believe alternatives to the third-party cookies, probabilistic or deterministic, will do more harm than good to their ads businesses.
Media Briefing: Why Leaf Group spun off its media arm into a standalone company
World of Good's newly appointed CEO Lindsey Abramo spoke with Digiday about her plans to lean into experiential and embrace niche vs. scale.
Dentsu’s latest ad report shows slowed growth, driven mostly by inflation
The good news in Dentsu's ad forecast is that there's still growth. The bad news: most of the growth is the result of inflation, while real ad pricing actually dropped a bit.
SponsoredWhat the measurement and currency discussion really means to TV advertisers
Ali Mack, head of TV and agency, Experian Major streaming video providers have recently made headlines by adopting new currencies for ad measurement, threatening Nielsen’s long-standing TV ratings monopoly. NBCUniversal, for example, has certified iSpot and VideoAmp as currencies for advanced audiences and formed the Joint Industry Committee with Paramount, TelevisaUnivision and Warner Bros. Discovery. […]
How chef influencer Tue Nguyen works with the BuzzFeed Creator Network
BuzzFeed's Creator Network has been valuable from an audience and production education standpoint, but Nguyen still drives most of her business on her own.
Dentsu’s new Web3 readiness tool shines light on the tech’s potential to complement AI
Dentsu's Innovation Initiative is launching a web3 readiness index next month — at a time when the industry is obsessed with AI. Could the two technologies actually make a good pair?